|
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
[1] A. C. Beall, J. M. Loomis, J. M. Philbeck, and T. J. Fikes. Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments. In Proc. Conference on Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Displays, pages 288- 297, Bellingham, WA, 1995. SPIE.
|
| |
2
|
[2] James E. Cutting and Peter M. Viston. Perceiving layout and knowing distance: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In William Epstein and Sheena Rogers, editors, Perceptual of Space and Motion, pages 69-117. Academic Press, New York, 1995.
|
| |
3
|
[3] Stephen R. Ellis and Brian M. Menges. Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: Interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand. Presence, 6(4):452-460, August 1997.
|
| |
4
|
[4] John M. Foley. Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87(5):411-434, 1980.
|
| |
5
|
[5] Sergio S. Fukusima, Jack M. Loomis, and Joseé A. DaSilva. Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(1):86-100, 1997.
|
| |
6
|
[6] Melvyn A. Goodale and Angela Haffenden. Frames of reference for perception and action in the human visual system. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 22(2):161-172, 1998.
|
| |
7
|
[7] J. M. Hollerbach, W. B. Thompson, and P. Shirley. The convergence of robotics, vision, and computer graphics for user interaction. International Journal of Robotics Research, 18:1088-1100, November 1999.
|
 |
8
|
Geoffrey S. Hubona , Philip N. Wheeler , Gregory W. Shirah , Matthew Brandt, The relative contributions of stereo, lighting, and background scenes in promoting 3D depth visualization, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.6 n.3, p.214-242, Sept. 1999
[doi> 10.1145/329693.329695]
|
| |
9
|
[9] Victoria Interrante. Perceiving and Representing Shape and Depth. PhD thesis, UNC-Chapel Hill, Department of Computer Science, 1996.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
[11] D. K. Kersten, P. Mamassian, and D. C. Knill. Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception, 26(2):171-192, 1997.
|
| |
12
|
[12] Lars Kjelldahl and Martin Prime. A study on how depth perception is affected by different presentation methods of 3D objects on a 2D display. Computers & Graphics, 19(2):199- 202, March 1995.
|
| |
13
|
[13] Jack M. Loomis, José A. DaSilva, Naofumi Fujita, and Sergio S. Fukusima. Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4):906-921, 1992.
|
| |
14
|
[14] Jack M. Loomis and Joshua M. Knapp. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas, editors, Virtual and Adaptive Environments. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, in press.
|
| |
15
|
[15] Jack M. Loomis and Joshua M. Knapp. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas, editors, Virtual and Adaptive Environments. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, in press.
|
| |
16
|
[16] Cindee Madison and Daniel Kersten. Use of interreflection and shadow for surface contact (poster). In Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), 1999.
|
| |
17
|
[17] Cindee Madison, Daniel J. Kersten, William B. Thompson, Peter Shirley, and Brian Smits. The use of subtle illumination cues for human judgement of spatial layout. Technical Report UUCS-99-001, Computer Science Department, University of Utah, January 1999. http://www.cs.utah.edu/vissim/bibliography/papers/madison- 99.pdf.
|
| |
18
|
[18] D. Rosenbaum. Human Motor Control. Academic Press, San Diego, 1991.
|
| |
19
|
[19] D. Rosenbaum, L. Loukopoulos, R. Meulenbroek, and J. Vaughan. Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102:28-67, 1995.
|
| |
20
|
[20] Philip Servos, Melvyn A. Goodale, and Lorna S. Jakobson. The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Research, 32(8):1513-1521, 1992.
|
| |
21
|
[21] R. T. Surdick, E. T. Davis, R. A. King, and L. F. Hodges. The perception of distance in simulated visual displays: A comparison of the effectiveness and accuracy of multiple depth cues across viewing distances. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(5):513-531, 1997.
|
| |
22
|
[22] William B. Thompson, Peter Shirley, Brian Smits, Daniel J. Kersten, and Cindee Madison. Visual glue. Technical Report UUCS-98-007, Computer Science Department, University of Utah, March 1998. http://www.cs.utah.edu/vissim/papers/glue/glue.html.
|
| |
23
|
Martin Usoh , Kevin Arthur , Mary C. Whitton , Rui Bastos , Anthony Steed , Mel Slater , Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments, Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.359-364, July 1999
[doi> 10.1145/311535.311589]
|
| |
24
|
[24] C. von Hofsten, H. L. Pick, Jr., and G. Neeley. The role of binocular information in ball catching. Journal of Motor Behavior , 24, 1992.
|
| |
25
|
|
 |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
[28] John P. Wann, Simon Rushton, and Mark Mon-Williams. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research, 35(19):2731-2736, 1995.
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
[31] Albert Yonas, Lynn T. Goldsmith, and Janet L. Hallstrom. Development of sensitivity to information provided by cast shadows in pictures. Perception, 7:333-341, 1978.
|
CITED BY 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean Sreng , Florian Bergez , Jérémie Legarrec , Anatole Lécuyer , Claude Andriot, Using an event-based approach to improve the multimodal rendering of 6DOF virtual contact, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, November 05-07, 2007, Newport Beach, California
|
|
|
J. Adam Jones , J. Edward Swan, II , Gurjot Singh , Eric Kolstad , Stephen R. Ellis, The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception, Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, August 09-10, 2008, Los Angeles, California
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
I.
Computing Methodologies
I.3
COMPUTER GRAPHICS
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.1
MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.1
Multimedia Information Systems
Subjects:
Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)
I.
Computing Methodologies
I.3
COMPUTER GRAPHICS
I.3.6
Methodology and Techniques
Subjects:
Interaction techniques
I.3.7
Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism
Subjects:
Virtual reality
General Terms:
Design,
Experimentation,
Human Factors,
Management,
Measurement,
Performance,
Theory
Keywords:
head mounted displays,
human visual perception,
virtual reality
|