ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Visual cues for imminent object contact in realistic virtual environment
Full text PdfPdf (4.53 MB)
Source IEEE Visualization archive
Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '00 table of contents
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Pages: 179 - 185  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-309-X
Authors
Sponsors
IEEE-CS\TCVCG : TC on Visualization and Computer Graphics
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society Press  Los Alamitos, CA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[1] A. C. Beall, J. M. Loomis, J. M. Philbeck, and T. J. Fikes. Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments. In Proc. Conference on Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Displays, pages 288- 297, Bellingham, WA, 1995. SPIE.
 
2
[2] James E. Cutting and Peter M. Viston. Perceiving layout and knowing distance: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In William Epstein and Sheena Rogers, editors, Perceptual of Space and Motion, pages 69-117. Academic Press, New York, 1995.
 
3
[3] Stephen R. Ellis and Brian M. Menges. Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: Interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand. Presence, 6(4):452-460, August 1997.
 
4
[4] John M. Foley. Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87(5):411-434, 1980.
 
5
[5] Sergio S. Fukusima, Jack M. Loomis, and Joseé A. DaSilva. Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(1):86-100, 1997.
 
6
[6] Melvyn A. Goodale and Angela Haffenden. Frames of reference for perception and action in the human visual system. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 22(2):161-172, 1998.
 
7
[7] J. M. Hollerbach, W. B. Thompson, and P. Shirley. The convergence of robotics, vision, and computer graphics for user interaction. International Journal of Robotics Research, 18:1088-1100, November 1999.
8
 
9
[9] Victoria Interrante. Perceiving and Representing Shape and Depth. PhD thesis, UNC-Chapel Hill, Department of Computer Science, 1996.
10
 
11
[11] D. K. Kersten, P. Mamassian, and D. C. Knill. Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception, 26(2):171-192, 1997.
 
12
[12] Lars Kjelldahl and Martin Prime. A study on how depth perception is affected by different presentation methods of 3D objects on a 2D display. Computers & Graphics, 19(2):199- 202, March 1995.
 
13
[13] Jack M. Loomis, José A. DaSilva, Naofumi Fujita, and Sergio S. Fukusima. Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4):906-921, 1992.
 
14
[14] Jack M. Loomis and Joshua M. Knapp. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas, editors, Virtual and Adaptive Environments. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, in press.
 
15
[15] Jack M. Loomis and Joshua M. Knapp. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas, editors, Virtual and Adaptive Environments. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, in press.
 
16
[16] Cindee Madison and Daniel Kersten. Use of interreflection and shadow for surface contact (poster). In Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), 1999.
 
17
[17] Cindee Madison, Daniel J. Kersten, William B. Thompson, Peter Shirley, and Brian Smits. The use of subtle illumination cues for human judgement of spatial layout. Technical Report UUCS-99-001, Computer Science Department, University of Utah, January 1999. http://www.cs.utah.edu/vissim/bibliography/papers/madison- 99.pdf.
 
18
[18] D. Rosenbaum. Human Motor Control. Academic Press, San Diego, 1991.
 
19
[19] D. Rosenbaum, L. Loukopoulos, R. Meulenbroek, and J. Vaughan. Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102:28-67, 1995.
 
20
[20] Philip Servos, Melvyn A. Goodale, and Lorna S. Jakobson. The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Research, 32(8):1513-1521, 1992.
 
21
[21] R. T. Surdick, E. T. Davis, R. A. King, and L. F. Hodges. The perception of distance in simulated visual displays: A comparison of the effectiveness and accuracy of multiple depth cues across viewing distances. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(5):513-531, 1997.
 
22
[22] William B. Thompson, Peter Shirley, Brian Smits, Daniel J. Kersten, and Cindee Madison. Visual glue. Technical Report UUCS-98-007, Computer Science Department, University of Utah, March 1998. http://www.cs.utah.edu/vissim/papers/glue/glue.html.
 
23
 
24
[24] C. von Hofsten, H. L. Pick, Jr., and G. Neeley. The role of binocular information in ball catching. Journal of Motor Behavior , 24, 1992.
 
25
26
 
27
 
28
[28] John P. Wann, Simon Rushton, and Mark Mon-Williams. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research, 35(19):2731-2736, 1995.
 
29
 
30
 
31
[31] Albert Yonas, Lynn T. Goldsmith, and Janet L. Hallstrom. Development of sensitivity to information provided by cast shadows in pictures. Perception, 7:333-341, 1978.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Helen H. Hu: colleagues
Amy A. Gooch: colleagues
William B. Thompson: colleagues
Brian E. Smits: colleagues
John J. Rieser: colleagues
Peter Shirley: colleagues