XML implementation of frame processor

ABSTRACT

A quantitative study has shown that frame technology [1] supported by Fusion toolset can lead to reduction in time- tomarket (70%) and project costs (84%). Frame technology has been developed to handle large COBOL- based business software product families. We wished to investigate how the principle of frame approach can be applied to support product families in other application domains, in particular to build distributed component- based systems written in Object- Oriented languages. As Fusion is tightly coupled with COBOL, we implemented our own tools based on frame concepts using the XML technology. In our solution, a generic architecture for a product family is a hierarchy of XML documents. Each such document contains a reusable program fragment instrumented for change with XML tags. We use a tool built on top of XML parsing framework JAXP to process documents in order to produce a custom member of a product family. Our solution is cost- effective and extensible. In the paper, we describe our solution, illustrating its use with examples. We intend to make our solution available to public in order to encourage investigation of frame concepts in other application domains, implementation languages and platforms.

REFERENCES

• 1: Paul G. Bassett, Framing software reuse: lessons from the real world, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996
• 2: D. Batory , B. Lofaso , Y. Smaragdakis, JTS: Tools for Implementing Domain-Specific Languages, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software Reuse, p.143, June 02-05, 1998
• 3: Alan W. Brown , Kurt C. Wallnau, The Current State of CBSE, IEEE Software, v.15 n.5, p.37-46, September 1998 [doi>10.1109/52.714622]
• 4: Yu Chye Cheong , Stanislaw Jarzabek, Frame-based method for customizing generic software architectures, Proceedings of the 1999 symposium on Software reusability, p.103-112, May 21-23, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/303008.303043]
• 5: Shigeru Chiba, Macro Processing in Object-Oriented Languages, Proceedings of the Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, p.113, November 23-26, 1998
• 6: Czarnecki, K. and Eisenecker, U. Generative Programming: Principles and Techniques of Software Engineering Based on Automated Configuration and Fragment-Based Component Models, Addison-Wesley, 2000
• 7: Jean-Marc DeBaud , Klaus Schmid, A systematic approach to derive the scope of software product lines, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, p.34-43, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/302405.302409]
• 8: Erich Gamma , Richard Helm , Ralph Johnson , John Vlissides, Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1995
• 9: Goguen, J. ,Parameterized programming, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-10, No. 5, pp. 528-543. 1994.
• 10: Stan Jarzabek , Peter Knauber, Synergy between component-based and generative approaches, Proceedings of the 7th European software engineering conference held jointly with the 7th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, p.429-445, September 06-10, 1999, Toulouse, France
• 11: Johnson, R. and Foote, B. Designing reusable classes, Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 1988, pp. 22-35.
• 12: Anssi Karhinen , Alexander Ran , Tapio Tallgren, Configuring designs for reuse, Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering, p.701-710, May 17-23, 1997, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/253228.253839]
• 13: Kiczales, G, Lamping, J., Mendhekar, A., Maeda, C., Lopes, C., Loingtier, J-M., Irwin, J. Aspect-Oriented Programming. in Proceeding of ECOOP'97, (Finland, 1997), Springer-Verlag LNCS 1241.
• 14: Parnas, D.L. On the design of program families. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-2, 1976, pp. 1-9.
• 15: Sommerville, I. and Dean, G. PCL: A language for modeling evolving system architectures, Software Engineering Journal, 1996, pp. 111-121.
• 16: SUN Java Technology and XML. Sun Microsystems, Inc. Retrieved July 23, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://java.sun.com/xml/
• 17: Peri Tarr , Harold Ossher , William Harrison , Stanley M. Sutton, Jr., N degrees of separation: multi-dimensional separation of concerns, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, p.107-119, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/302405.302457]
• 18: W3C 1998. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. REC-xml- 19980210, W3C. Retrieved July 23, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml
• 19: Wong, T. W. Methods and tools for a generic Computer Aided Dispatch System, M. Sc. Thesis, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, September 2000

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
        D.2.11 Software Architectures
            Subjects: Domain-specific architectures

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
      I.2.4 Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
          Subjects: Frames and scripts
  I.7 DOCUMENT AND TEXT PROCESSING
      I.7.2 Document Preparation

          Nouns: XML

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Languages, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
frame technology, product families, variant requirements