Implementing product line variabilities

ABSTRACT

Software product lines have numerous members. Thus, a product line infrastructure must cover various systems. This is the significant difference to usual software systems and the reason for additional requirements on the various assets present during software product line engineering. It is imperative that they support the description of the product line as a whole, as well as its instantiation for the derivation of individual products. Literature has already addressed how to create and instantiate generic product line assets, such as domain models and architectures to generate instance specific ones [1, 2, 3], yet little attention has been given on how to actually deal with this genericity at the code level. This paper addresses the issue of handling product line variability at the code level. To this end various implementation approaches are examined with respect to their use in a product line context.

REFERENCES

• 1: Michalis Anastasopoulos, Joachim Bayer, Oliver Flege and Cristina Gacek, A Process for Product Line Architecture Creation and Evaluation PuLSE-DSSA - Version 2.0, Fraunhofer IESE Report No. 038.00/E, June 2000
• 2: Cristina Gacek and Anton Vukovic, "Vital: Representing Software Reference Architectures," in Proceedings of the Fourth International Software Architecture Workshop (ISAW-4), Limerick, Ireland, pp. 105-110, June 2000.
• 3: Joachim Bayer, Cristina Gacek, Dirk Muthig and Tanya Widen, "PuLSE-I: Deriving Instances from a Product Line Infrastructure," in Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS 2000), Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 237-245, April 2000.
• 4: James O. Coplien, Multi-paradigm design for C++, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1998
• 5: David C. Sharp, "Containing and Facilitating Change Via Object Oriented Tailoring Techniques," to appear in Proceedings of The First Software Product Line Conference Denver, Colorado, August, 2000
• 6: Mikael Svahnberg, Variability in Evolving Software Product Lines, Licentiate thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Software Engineering and Computer Science, Karlskrona, Sweden, 2000
• 7: Mira Mezini, Variational Object Oriented Programming, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Siegen, Germany, 1997
• 8: Krzysztof Czarnecki , Ulrich W. Eisenecker, Generative programming: methods, tools, and applications, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 2000
• 9: Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Programming Tools Group, Intentional Programming Project (http://web.com-lab. ox.ac.uk/oucl/research/areas/progtools/intentional.htm)
• 10: Peter van der Linden, Expert C programming: deep C secrets, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1994
• 11: Gregor Kiczales et al, "Aspect Oriented Programming", Springer-Verlag, 1997, available under http:// www.parc.xerox.com/csl/groups/sda/publications/papers/Kiczales-ECOOP97/
• 12: Homepage of the Subject-oriented Research Project, IBM, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, see http://www.research.ibm.com/sop
• 13: Harold Ossher and Peri Tarr, "Operation-Level Composition: A Case in (Join) Point," in Proceedings of ECOOP 1998 workshop on Aspect-Oriented Programming, Finland, pp 116-120, 1998
• 14: Krzysztof Czarnecki , Ulrich W. Eisenecker , Robert Glück , David Vandevoorde , Todd L. Veldhuizen, Generative Programming and Active Libraries, Selected Papers from the International Seminar on Generic Programming, p.25-39, April 27-May 01, 1998
• 15: Paul G. Basset, Framing Software Reuse, Yourdon Press Computing Series, 1997
• 16: Karl Eugene Wiegers, Software Requirements, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, 1999
• 17: Xavier Pacheco, The Builder Pattern, available under http:// www.delphimag.com
• 18: Erich Gamma , Richard Helm , Ralph Johnson , John Vlissides, Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1995
• 19: Oliver Lewis, Performance Issues of Variability Design in Embedded System Application Families, Ph.D. Dissertation, November, 2000, available under http://www.dcs.napier.ac.uk/ ~bill/oli/

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
        D.2.11 Software Architectures
            Subjects: Patterns (e.g., client/server, pipeline, blackboard)

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.1 THE COMPUTER INDUSTRY
      Subjects: Suppliers

General Terms:
Design, Measurement, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
implementation approaches, implementing variabilities, product line variability, software product lines, traceability