|
ABSTRACT
In current role-based systems, security officers handle assignments of users to roles. However, fully depending on this functionality may increase management efforts in a distributed environment because of the continuous involvement from security officers. The emerging technology of role-based delegation provides a means for implementing RBAC in a distributed environment with empowerment of individual users. The basic idea behind a role-based delegation is that users themselves may delegate role authorities to other users to carry out some functions on behalf of the former. This paper presents a role-based delegation model called RDM2000 (role-based delegation model 2000), which is an extension of RBDM0 by supporting hierarchical roles and multi-step delegation. The paper explores different approaches for delegation and revocation. Also, a rule-based language for specifying and enforcing the policies based on RDM2000 is introduced.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Venkata Bhamidipati and Ravi Sandhu. Push Architectures for USER ROLE Assignment. Proceedings of 23 rd National Information Systems Security Conference, pages 89-100, Baltimore, Oct. 16-19, 2000
|
| |
7
|
Ezedin Barka and Ravi Sandhu. A Role-based Delegation Model and Some Extensions. Proceedings of 16 th Annual Computer Security Application Conference, Sheraton New Orleans, Dec. 11-15, 2000
|
| |
8
|
Ezedin Barka and Ravi Sandhu. Framework for Role-Based Delegation Model. Proceedings of 23 rd National Information Systems Security Conference, pages 101- 114, Baltimore, Oct. 16-19, 2000
|
| |
9
|
David Ferriaolo, Janet Cugini, and Richard Kuhn. Role-based access control (RBAC): Features and Motivations. Proceeding s of 11 th Annual Computer Security Application Conference, pages 241-248, New Orleans, LA, Dec 11-15 1995.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Morrie Gasser, Ellen McDermott. An Architecture for Practical Delegation a Distributed System. 1990 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy. Oakland, CA, May 7-9,1990
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
C. Ellison, B. Frantz, B. Lampson, R. Rivest, B. Thomas, T. Ylonen. SPKI Certificate Theory, RFC2693, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2693.txt, 1999
|
CITED BY 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidehito Gomi , Makoto Hatakeyama , Shigeru Hosono , Satoru Fujita, A delegation framework for federated identity management, Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Digital identity management, November 11-11, 2005, Fairfax, VA, USA
|
|
|
Hua Wang , Jiuyong Li , Ron Addie , Stijn Dekeyser , Richard Watson, A framework for role-based group deligation in distributed environments, Proceedings of the 29th Australasian Computer Science Conference, p.321-328, January 16-19, 2006, Hobart, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quan Pham , Jason Reid , Adrian McCullagh , Ed Dawson, Commitment issues in delegation process, Proceedings of the sixth Australasian conference on Information security, January 01-01, 2008, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
|
|