ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Picking fruit from the tree of life: comments on taxonomic sampling and quartet methods
Full text PdfPdf (77 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2001 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Pages: 61 - 67  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-287-5
Authors
Jonathan H. Badger  Bioinformatics Research Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Paul Kearney  Bioinformatics Research Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/372202.372276
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
K. S. Brown. Deep Green rewrites evolutionary history of plants. Science, 285:990-991, 1999.
 
3
 
4
 
5
J. Felsenstein. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility will be positively misleading. Sys. Zoo., 27:401-410, 1978.
 
6
J. Felsenstein. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol., 17:368-376, 1981.
 
7
W. M. Fitch. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimal change for a specific tree topology. Sys. Zoo., 20:406-41, 1971.
 
8
A. Graybeal. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Sys. Biol., 47:9-17, 1998.
 
9
M. Hasegawa, H. Kishino, and K. Yano. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol., 22:160-174, 1985.
 
10
M. D. Hendy and D. Penny. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Sys. Zoo., 38:297-309, 1989.
 
11
D. M. Hillis. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature, 383:130, 1996.
 
12
J. Kim. General inconsistency conditions for maximum parsimony: Effects of branch lengths and increasing numbers of taxa. Sys. Biol., 45:363-374, 1996.
 
13
B. L. Maidak, J. R. Cole, C. T. Parker, G. M. G. Jr, N. Larsen, B. Li, T. G. Lilburn, M. J. McCaughey, G. J. Olsen, R. Overbeek, S. Pramanik, T. M. Schmidt, J. M. Tiedje, and C. R. Woese. A new version of the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Research, 27:171-173, 1999.
 
14
S. Poe. Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxonomic sampling. Sys. Biol., 47:18-31, 1998.
 
15
N. Saitou and M. Nei. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4:406-425, 1987.
 
16
K. Smith and T. Warnow. Taxon sampling and accuracy of evolutionary tree reconstruction. In DIMACS Symposium on Large Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction, 1998.
 
17
K. Strimmer and A. von Haeseler. Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol., 13:964-969, 1996.
 
18
D. L. Swofford. PAUP* (Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and Other Methods) version 4.0b4a. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts., 2000.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jonathan H. Badger: colleagues
Paul Kearney: colleagues