ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Rank aggregation methods for the Web
Full text PdfPdf (288 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Pages: 613 - 622  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-348-0
Authors
Cynthia Dwork  Compaq Systems Research Center, 130 Lytton Ave., Palo, Alto, CA
Ravi Kumar  IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA
Moni Naor  Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
D. Sivakumar  IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGLINK: Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
IW3C2 : International World Wide Web Conference Committee
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 43,   Downloads (12 Months): 291,   Citation Count: 128
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/371920.372165
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Search Engine Watch, www.searchenginewatch.com
 
2
Search Engine Watch article, www.searchenginewatch.com /sereport/00/11-inclusion.html
 
3
Metacrawler, www.metacrawler.com
4
 
5
J. J. Bartholdi, C. A. Tovey, and M. A. Trick. Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election. Social Choice and Welfare, 6(2):157-165, 1989.
 
6
J. C. Borda. Memoire sur les elections au scrutin. Histoire de l'Academie Royale des Sciences, 1781.
 
7
 
8
S. Chakrabarti, B. Dom, D. Gibson, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. Tomkins. Experiments in topic distillation, Proc. ACM SIGIR Workshop on Hypertext Information Retrieval on the Web, 1998.
 
9
M.-J. Condorcet. Essai surl'application de l'analyse a la probabilitie des decisions rendues a la pluralite des voix, 1785.
 
10
A. H. Copeland. A reasonable social welfare function. Mimeo, University ofMichigan, 1951.
 
11
D. E. Critchlow. Metric Methods for Analyzing Partially Ranked Data, LNS 34, Springer-Verlag, 1985.
 
12
P. Diaconis. Group Representation in Probability and Statistics. IMS Lecture Series 11, IMS, 1988.
 
13
P. Diaconis and R. Graham. Spearman's footrule as a measure of disarray. J. of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(2):262-268, 1977.
 
14
G. Even, J. Naor, B. Schieber, and M. Sudan. Approximating minimum feedback sets and multicuts in directed graphs. Algorithmica, 20(2):151-174, 1998.
 
15
16
 
17
J. I. Marden. Analyzing and Modeling Rank Data. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, No 64, Chapman & Hall, 1995.
 
18
Media Metrix search engine ratings. www.searchenginewatch.com/reports/mediametrix.html
 
19
D. G. Saari. The mathematics of voting: Democratic symmetry. Economist, pp. 83, March 4, 2000.
 
20
 
21
J. H. Smith. Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate. SIAM J. on Applied Math., 41:1027-1041, 1973.
 
22
M. Truchon. An extension of the Condorcet criterion and Kemeny orders. cahier 98-15 du Centre deRecherche en Economie et Finance Appliquees, 1998.
 
23
H. P. Young. An axiomatization of Borda's rule. J. Economic Theory, 9:43-52, 1974.
 
24
H. P. Young. Condorcet's theory of Voting. Amer. Political Sci. Review, 82:1231-1244, 1988.
 
25
H. P. Young and A. Levenglick. A consistent extension of Condorcet's election principle. SIAM J. on Applied Math., 35(2):285-300, 1978.

CITED BY  128

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cynthia Dwork: colleagues
Ravi Kumar: colleagues
Moni Naor: colleagues
D. Sivakumar: colleagues