|
ABSTRACT
Conformance has been used as a correctness criterion for asynchronous circuits. In the case of untimed systems, conformance of an implementation to a specification is equivalent to the failure-freeness between the implementation and the mirror of the specification. For bounded-delay systems, in general this property does not hold. In this paper, we define various notions of failures and examine whether the above property holds or not. We then discuss an alternative and effective algorithm for conformance checking of bounded-delay asynchronous circuits.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
J. Ebergen and R. Berks, "VERDECT: A verifier for Asynchronous Circuits," IEEE TCCA Newsletter, 1995.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
H. Schlingloff, O. Meyer and T. H. ulsing, "Correctness Analysis of an Embedded Controller," Proc. Int. Conf. on Data Systems in Aerospace (Dasia '99), Lissabon, 1999.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
B. Zhou and T. Yoneda, "Verification of asynchronous circuits with bounded delay model,"(in Japanese) IEICE journal, Vol. J82-D-I, No. 7, pp. 819-833, 1999.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
B. Zhou, T. Yoneda and B. Schlingloff, "Conformance and Mirroring for Timed Asynchronous Circuits," TIT technical report, 2000.
|
|