ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On partitioning vs. placement rent properties
Full text PdfPdf (324 KB)
Source International Workshop on System-Level Interconnect Prediction archive
Proceedings of the 2001 international workshop on System-level interconnect prediction table of contents
Sonoma, California, United States
Pages: 33 - 40  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-315-4
Authors
P. Verplaetse  Ghent Univ., Belgium
J. Dambre  Ghent Univ., Belgium
D. Stroobandt  Ghent Univ., Belgium
J. Van Campenhout  Ghent Univ., Belgium
Sponsor
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 13
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/368640.368665
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Rent's rule can be derived by direct partitioning of the circuit netlist, by indirect partitioning of the placed layout, or by averaging the number of terminals for various equally large regions of the placed circuit. It is shown that all three methods may produce different results. After investigation of the fundamental reasons for these differences, three distinct effects can be identified. The boundary and the embedding effect is present with all placement approaches, though the embedding effect may be (partly) nullified by the grid effect that may occur with some partitioning-based placement algorithms.One of the main applications of Rent's rule is the estimation of wire length distribution. Both flat and hierarchical placement models can be applied, though experiments show that for the current state-of-the-art estimation techniques the latter produces better results, even for layouts that were generated using a flat placement approach. Which Rent parameters and occupation probability function should be used depends on the placement algorithm. We discuss various possibilities and present a new occupation probability function that allows better wire length estimations of partitioning-based placements.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
J. A. Davis, V. K. De, and J. D. Meindl. A stochastic wire-length distribution for gigascale integration (GSI) - PART I: Derivation and validation. IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, 45(3):580-589, March 1998.
 
5
W. E. Donath. Wire length distribution for placements of computer logic. IBM J. of Research and Development, 25:152-155, 1981.
 
6
G. Karypis and V. Kumar. hMetis: A Hypergraph Partitioning Package, November 1998. Available at: http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/_karypis/metis/hmetis/ main.shtml.
 
7
B. S. Landman and R. L. Russo. On a pin versus block relationship for partitions of logic graphs. IEEE Trans. on Comput., C-20:1469-1479, 1971.
 
8
 
9
D. Stroobandt. Analytical methods for a priori wire length estimates in computer systems, November 1998. Ph.D. thesis (translated from Dutch), University of Ghent, Faculty of Applied Sciences.
 
10
 
11
D. Stroobandt, P. Verplaetse, and J. Van Campenhout. Generating synthetic benchmark circuits for evaluating CAD tools. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems., 19(9):1011-1022, September 2000.
 
12
P. Suarism and G. Kedem. An algorithm for quadrisection and its application to standard cell placement. IEEE Trans. on Circuits & Systems, 35(3):294-303, March 1988.
 
13
W. Sun and C. Sechen. Efficient and effective placement for very large circuits. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 14(3):349-359, March 1995.
 
14
P. Verplaetse. A stochastic model for the interconnection topology of digital circuits. Technical Report PARIS 00-07, Ghent University, Belgium, ELIS Department, December 2000. Submitted to IEEE Trans. on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.
 
15
16

CITED BY  13

Collaborative Colleagues:
P. Verplaetse: colleagues
J. Dambre: colleagues
D. Stroobandt: colleagues
J. Van Campenhout: colleagues