| Stability preserving transformations: packet routing networks with edge capacities and speeds |
| Full text |
Pdf
(698 KB)
|
| Source
|
Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
archive
Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 601 - 610
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:0-89871-490-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
Allan Borodin
|
Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 3G4
|
|
Rafail Ostrovsky
|
Telcordia Technologies, MCC-1C357B, 445 South Street, Morristown, New Jersey
|
|
Yuval Rabani
|
Computer Science Department, Technion -- IIT, Haifa 32000, Israel
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Philadelphia, PA, USA
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 15, Citation Count: 3
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In the context of an adversarial input model, we consider the effect on stability results when edges in packet routing networks can have capacities and speeds/slowdowns. In traditional packet routing networks, every edge is considered to have the same unit capacity and unit speed. We consider both static modifications (i.e. where the capacity or speed of an edge is fixed) and dynamic modifications where either the capacity or the speed of an edge can be dynamically changing over time. Amongst our results, we show that the universal stability of LIS is not preserved when either the capacity or the speed is changing dynamically whereas many other common scheduling protocols do maintain their universal stability. In terms of universal stability of networks, stability is preserved for dynamically changing capacities and speeds. The situation for static modifications, is not as clear but we are able to show that (in contrast to the dynamic case) that any “well defined” universally stable scheduling rule maintains its universality under static capacities, and common scheduling rules also maintain their universal stability under static speeds.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
William Aiello , Eyal Kushilevitz , Rafail Ostrovsky , Adi Rosén, Adaptive packet routing for bursty adversarial traffic, Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.359-368, May 24-26, 1998, Dallas, Texas, United States
[doi> 10.1145/276698.276788]
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
Matthew Andrews , Baruch Awerbuch , Antonio Fernández , Tom Leighton , Zhiyong Liu , Jon Kleinberg, Universal-stability results and performance bounds for greedy contention-resolution protocols, Journal of the ACM (JACM), v.48 n.1, p.39-69, Jan. 2001
[doi> 10.1145/363647.363677]
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
Allan Borodin , Jon Kleinberg , Prabhakar Raghavan , Madhu Sudan , David P. Williamson, Adversarial queueing theory, Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.376-385, May 22-24, 1996, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
[doi> 10.1145/237814.237984]
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
P. TSAPARAS. Stability in Adversarial Queueing Theory M.Sc Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1997.
|
|