ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Parallel processor scheduling with delay constraints
Full text PdfPdf (729 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 577 - 585  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:0-89871-490-7
Authors
Daniel W. Engels  MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, Cambridge, MA
Jon Feldman  MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, Cambridge, MA
David R. Karger  MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, Cambridge, MA
Matthias Ruhl  MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIAM : Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of scheduling unit-length jobs on identical parallel machines such that the makespan of the resulting schedule is minimized. Precedence constraints impose a partial order on the jobs, and both communication and precedence delays impose relative timing constraints on dependent jobs. The combination of these two types of timing constraints naturally models the instruction scheduling problem that occurs during software compilation for state-of-the-art VLIW (Very Long Instruction Word) processors and multiprocessor parallel machines.

We present the first known polynomial-time algorithm for the case where the precedence constraint graph is a forest of in-trees (or a forest of out-trees), the number of machines m is fixed, and the delays (which are a function of both the job pair and the machines on which they run) are bounded by a constant D.

Our algorithm relies on a new structural theorem for scheduling jobs with arbitrary precedence constraints. Given an instance with many independent dags, the theorem shows how to convert, in linear time, a schedule S for only the largest dags into a complete schedule that is either optimal or has the same makespan as S.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
P. Chretienne and C. Picouleau. Scheduling with communication delays: A survey. In P. Chretienne, Jr. E. G. Coffman, J. K. Lenstra, and Z. Liu, editors, Scheduling Theory and its Applications, pages 65-90. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1995.
 
3
E.G. Coffman, Jr. and R.L. Graham. Optimal sequencing for two-processor systems. Acta Informatica, 1:200-213, 1972.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
R.L. Graham, E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan. Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A Survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 5:287-326, 1979.
 
9
Intel Corporation. The IA-64 Architecture Software Developer's Manual, January 2000.
10
 
11
 
12
Rolf H. M6hring and Markus W. Schoffter. A simple approximation algorithm for scheduling forests with unit processing times and zero-one communication delays. Technical Report 506, Technische Universitat Berlin, Germany, 1995,
13
 
14
C. Picouleau. Etude de problemes les systdmes distrubes. PhD thesis, Univ. Pierre et Madame Curie, Paris, France, 1992.
 
15
Texas Instruments. TMS320C6000 Programmer's Guide, March 2000.
 
16
J.D. Ullman. NP-complete scheduling problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 10(3):384-393, June 1975.
 
17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Daniel W. Engels: colleagues
Jon Feldman: colleagues
David R. Karger: colleagues
Matthias Ruhl: colleagues