ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Reading of electronic documents: the usability of linear, fisheye, and overview+detail interfaces
Full text PdfPdf (409 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 293 - 300  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-327-8
Authors
Kasper Hornbæk  Department of Computing, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen East, Denmark
Erik Frøkjær  Datalogi, Roskilde Universitetscenter, Roskilde, Denmark
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 116,   Citation Count: 31
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/365024.365118
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Reading of electronic documents is becoming increasingly important as more information is disseminated electronically. We present an experiment that compares the usability of a linear, a fisheye, and an overview+detail interface for electronic documents. Using these interfaces, 20 subjects wrote essays and answered questions about scientific documents. Essays written using the overview+detail interface received higher grades, while subjects using the fisheye interface read documents faster. However, subjects used more time to answer questions with the overview+detail interface. All but one subject preferred the overview+detail interface. The most common interface in practical use, the linear interface, is found to be inferior to the fisheye and overview+detail interfaces regarding most aspects of usability. We recommend using overview+detail interfaces for electronic documents, while fisheye interfaces mainly should be considered for time-critical tasks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Belkin, N. J. Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior, in Information retrieval '93. Von der Modellierung zur Anwendung (Konstanz, Sep 1993), Universitaetsverlag Konstanz, 55-66.
 
2
Bishop, A. P. Working Towards an Understanding of Digital Library Use, D-Lib Magazine, October 1995 (1995).
3
 
4
Boguraev, B., Kennedy, C., Bellamy, R., Brawer, S., & Wong, Y. Y. Dynamic presentation of document content for rapid online skimming, in AAAI Spring 1998 Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarization (Stanford CA, Mar 1998), AAAI Press, 109-118.
 
5
6
7
 
8
 
9
Chen, C. & Rada, R. Interacting With Hypertext:A Meta- Analysis of Experimental Studies, Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 2 (1996), 125-156.
 
10
Dee-Lucas, D. & Larkin, J. H. Learning From Electronic Texts: Effects of Interactive Overview for Information Access, Cognition and Instruction, 13, 3 (1995), 431-468.
 
11
12
 
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
 
20
21
22
 
23
Paez, L. B., da Silva-Fh., J. B., & Marchionini, G. Disorientation in Electronic Environments: A Study of Hypertext and Continuous Zooming Interfaces, in Proceedings of ASIS '96 (Baltimore MD, Nov 1996), 58-66.
 
24
25
 
26
27
 
28
 
29
Tomney, H. & Burton, P. F. Electronic Journals: a Study of Usage and Attitudes Among Academics, Journal of Information Science, 24, 6 (1998), 419-429.
30

CITED BY  31

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kasper Hornbæk: colleagues
Erik Frøkjær: colleagues