ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Robust annotation positioning in digital documents
Full text PdfPdf (397 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 285 - 292  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-327-8
Authors
A. J. Bernheim Brush  Collaboration and Multimedia Systems Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
David Bargeron  Collaboration and Multimedia Systems Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Anoop Gupta  Collaboration and Multimedia Systems Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
J. J. Cadiz  Collaboration and Multimedia Systems Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 97,   Citation Count: 20
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/365024.365117
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Increasingly, documents exist primarily in digital form. System designers have recently focused on making it easier to read digital documents, with annotation as an important new feature. But supporting annotation well is difficult because digital documents are frequently modified, making it challenging to correctly reposition annotations in modified versions. Few systems have addressed this issue, and even fewer have approached the problem from the users' point of view. This paper reports the results of two studies examining user expectations for robust annotation positioning in modified documents. We explore how users react to lost annotations, the relationship between types of document modifications and user expectations, and whether users pay attention to text surrounding their annotations. Our results could contribute substantially to effective digital document annotation systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adobe Acrobat, http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/main.html
 
2
3
 
4
Davis and Huttenlocher. CoNote System Overview. (1995) http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/dph/annotation/annotations .html
 
5
E-Quill. http://www.e-quill.com/
 
6
 
7
Laliberte, D., and Braverman, A. A Protocol for Scalable Group and Public Annotations. 1997 NCSA Technical Proposal, http://www.hypernews.org/~liberte/www/ scalable-annotations.html
8
9
 
10
Microsoft ebook Reader, http://www.microsoft.com/reader/
 
11
Microsoft Office 2000 Web Discussions, http://officeupdate.microsoft.com/2000/focus/articles/wWe bDiscussions.htm
 
12
Microsoft Word, http://www.microsoft.com/office/word/using.htm
13
 
14
NotePals, http://guir.berkeley.edu/projects/notepals/
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
ThirdVoice web annotations. http://www.thirdvoice.com/.
21
 
22

CITED BY  20


REVIEW

"Maxine Cohen : Reviewer"

This paper reports the results of two studies examining user expectations of robust annotation positioning in modified documents. The authors present an interesting case for one of the problems encountered by users as we move our world ever deeper  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
A. J. Bernheim Brush: colleagues
David Bargeron: colleagues
Anoop Gupta: colleagues
J. J. Cadiz: colleagues