ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An innovative design and studio-based CS degree
Full text PdfPdf (62 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education table of contents
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Pages: 233 - 237  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-329-4
Also published in ...
Authors
Michael Docherty  Information Environments Program, School of CSEE, The University of Queensland, Ipswich QLD 4305 Australia
Peter Sutton  Information Environments Program, School of CSEE, The University of Queensland, Ipswich QLD 4305 Australia
Margot Brereton  Information Environments Program, School of CSEE, The University of Queensland, Ipswich QLD 4305 Australia
Simon Kaplan  Information Environments Program, School of CSEE, The University of Queensland, Ipswich QLD 4305 Australia
Sponsor
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/364447.364591
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The University of Queensland has recently established a new design-focused, studio-based computer science degree. The Bachelor of Information Environments degree augments the core courses from the University's standard CS degree with a stream of design courses and integrative studio-based projects undertaken every semester. The studio projects integrate and reinforce learning by requiring students to apply the knowledge and skills gained in other courses to open-ended real-world design projects. The studio model is based on the architectural studio and involves teamwork, collaborative learning, interactive problem solving, presentations and peer review. This paper describes the degree program, its curriculum and rationale, and reports on experiences in the first year of delivery.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Brown, A. (1997) Designing for learning: What are the essential features of an effective online course? Australian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 13, No. 2, summer 1997, pp 115-126..
 
2
Fetterman, David, M. (1998) Ethnography : Step by Step (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol 17), 2nd edition.
 
3
Hooper Woolsey, K., S Kim, G Curtis (1996) VizAbility Handbook and CDRom, PWS Publishing.
 
4
Jonassen, D., Mayes, T., & McAleese, R. (1993) A manifesto for a constructivist approach to uses of technology in higher education. In T. Duffy, J. Lowyck and D. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing Environments for Constructivist Learning Berlin Heidelberg, Springer- Verlag.
 
5
Jonassen, D., & Reeves, T. (1996) Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology New York, Macmillan.
 
6
Lebow, D. (1993) Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41 (3), 4-16.
 
7
McKim, Robert H (1980). Experiences in Visual Thinking by Robert H. 2nd edition, Brooks/Cole Pub Co.
 
8
Oliver, R. (1998) Teaching and Learning on the World Wide Web: A Guide for Teachers Western Australia, Edith Cowan University.
 
9
Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. (1969), "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning," Policy Sciences 4, Elsevier Science, pp 155-173.
 
10
Shuell, T. (1986) Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411-36.
 
11
 
12
Sims, R. (1999) Interactivity and narrative: Strategies for effective learning, in B. Collis and R. Oliver (Eds.) Proceedings of EdMedia 1999. Charlottesville, VA, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
 
13
Trevitt, C. & Chalmers, D. (2000) Learning, architecture, planning and design: An empirical investigation of learning spaces at The University of Queensland. Conference paper to be published in the proceedings of the ASET /HERDSA Conference, Flexible Learning for a Flexible Society USQ, Toowoomba, Queensland


Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael Docherty: colleagues
Peter Sutton: colleagues
Margot Brereton: colleagues
Simon Kaplan: colleagues