ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Summary remarks
Full text PdfPdf (568 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 7 ,  Issue 2  (February 1964) table of contents
Pages: 133 - 136  
Year of Publication: 1964
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/363921.363946
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The topics began with discussion of almost exclusively syntactic analysis and methods. Beginning with context-free phrase-structure languages, we considered limitations thereof to remove generative syntactic ambiguities (Floyd), and extensions thereto to introduce more context-dependence (Rose). As the conference proceeded we ran through a spectrum of considerations in which the expressions in the languages considered were examined less and less as meaningless objects (the formal, or purely syntactic approach, as in the paper by Steel) and required more and more meaningful interpretations. In other words, we became more and more involved with semantic considerations. It is clear, then, that applications of the study of mechanical languages to programming must involve semantic questions; ADD must mean something more than the concatenation of three (not two) characters. The papers beyond Session 1 were therefore discussing the mechanization of semantics, but in only one case did we hear about the formalization (and hence mechanization) of the specification of the semantics of a language (McCarthy).