ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Code size minimization and retargetable assembly for custom EPIC and VLIW instruction formats
Full text PdfPdf (568 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 4  (October 2000) table of contents
Pages: 752 - 773  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISSN:1084-4309
Authors
Shail Aditya  Hewlett-Packard Lab, Palo Alto, CA
Scott A. Mahlke  Hewlett-Packard Lab, Palo Alto, CA
B. Ramakrishna Rau  Hewlett-Packard Lab, Palo Alto, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 36,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/362652.362658
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

PICO is a fully automated system for designing the architecture and the microarchitecture of VLIW and EPIC processors. A serious concern with this class of processors, due to their very long instructions, is their code size. One focus of this paper is to describe a series of code size minimization techniques used within PICO, some of which are applied during the automatic design of the instruction format, while others are applied during program assembly. The design of a retargetable assembler to support these techniques also poses certain novel challenges, which constitute the second focus of this paper. Contrary to widely held perceptions, we demonstrate that it is entirely possible to design VLIW and EPIC processors that are capable of issuing large numbers of operational per cycle, but whose code size is only moderately larger than that for a sequential CISC processor.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ADITYA, S., RAU, B. R., AND JOHNSON, R. C. 2000. Automatic design of VLIW and EPIC instruction formats. HPL Technical Report HPL-1999-94, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories.
 
2
 
3
ARNOLD, M. AND CORPORAAL, H. 1999. Instruction set synthesis using operation pattern detection. In Fifth Annual Conference of ASCI (Heijen, The Netherlands, 1999).
 
4
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
INTEL CORPORATION. 1999. IA-64 Application Developer's Architecture Guide.
 
9
KATHAIL, V., SCHLANSKER, M., AND RAU, B. R. 2000. HPL-PD architecture specification: Version 1.1. Technical Report HPL-93-80 (R.1), Hewlett-Packard Laboratories.
 
10
 
11
 
12
LIAO, S. Y., DEVADAS, S., AND KEUTZER, K. 1998. Code density optimization for embedded DSP processors using data compression techniques. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 17, 7, 601-608.
 
13
PHILIPS SEMICONDUCTORS. 1997. Trimedia TM-1 Media Processor Data Book.
 
14
RAU, B. R. 1988. Cydra 5 directed dataflow architecture. In COMPCON '88 (San Francisco, 1988), 106-113.
 
15
RAU, B. R., KATHAIL, V., AND ADITYA, S. 1999. Machine-description driven compilers for EPIC and VLIW processors. Design Automation for Embedded Systems 4, 2/3, 71-118.
 
16
 
17
18


Collaborative Colleagues:
Shail Aditya: colleagues
Scott A. Mahlke: colleagues
B. Ramakrishna Rau: colleagues