Arguments for a moratorium on the construction of a community information utility

ABSTRACT

In this article the author urges a prudent and decentralized approach to the question of the design and desirability of computerized community information utilities. Before accepting the inevitability and desirability of this or any technology, we should: (1) be sure of the feasibility (internally and externally) of what is proposed; (2) project and perhaps wait for changes in complementary techniques; (3) evaluate current and projected supplementary techniques; (4) establish the existence of demand for what is proposed; (5) take steps to involve a representative group of ultimate users in systems design, and (6) carefully think through possible side effects on man and his world view. Current proposals for community information utilities are examined in this framework, and the conclusion is drawn that society is not yet in a position to justify either the construction of an information utility in a prototype community or the acceptance of a policy in favor of its widespread implementation.

REFERENCES

• 1: Sackman, H. and Boehm, B.W. (Eds). Planning Community Information Utilities. AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1972.
• 2: Parker E.B. and Dunn, D.A. "Information Technology: Its Social Potential,' Science, vol. 176, pp. 1392-9.
• 3: Japan Computer Usage Development Institute, The Plan for Information Society--a National Goal Toward Year 2000 {sic}, 1972.
• 4: McDermott, J. Technology: The opiate of the intellectuals. New York Review of Books, July 31, 1969.
• 5: Taube, M. Computers and Common Sense, Ch. 1, 2, 3. Columbia U. Press, New York, 1966.
• 6: Nielsen, N.R. Economic Design. In {1}.
• 7: Day, L. The future of computer and communications services. Proc. AFIPS 1973 NCC, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J.
• 8: Bedford, M. The Future of Communications Services in the Home, Business Planning, Bell Canada, Montreal, Nov. 1972 (proprietary).
• 9: Kling, R. Towards a person-centered computer technology. Proc. ACM 1972 Nat. Conf.
• 10: Goodman, P. Can technology be humane? New York Review of Books, Nov 20, 1969.
• 11: A national survey of the publics attitudes toward computers. Time Magazine and}AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., Nov. 1971.
• 12: The People's Computer Company, Box 310, Menlo Park, CA 94025. Also by the same publisher, a quarterly which carries news of other such centers.
• 13: Gilchrlst, B. Public involvement and acceptance.
• 14: Press, L. Toward information processing literacy. Honeywell Computer J. 7, 7 (1973).
• 15: Mumford, L. Technics and Civilization. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1934.
• 16: Watson, T.J. Jr. Technological change. In Goals for Americans, The Report of the President's Committee on National Goals. Prentice-Hall, Engiewood Cliffs, N.J., 1960.
• 17: Simon, H.A. A computer for everyman. American Scholar (1966), 258-264.
• 18: Forster, E.M. The Eternal Moment and Other Stories. Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York, 1928.
• 19: Thoreau, H.D. Walden. The New American Library, New York, 1960.
• 20: Wiener, N. The Human Use of Human Beings, Cybernetics and Society, Doubleday, New York, 1954.
• 21: Nilles, J., Carlson, F., Hanneman, G. and Gray, P. Development of policy on the transportation/ telecommunications trade-off, final report. NSF Grant GI-39019, June 1974.
• 22: Press, L.I. Toward information processing Iiteracy--,experience teaching programming. Pruc. Fifth Conf. on Computers in the Undergraduate Curricula. Pullman, Washington, June 1974.
• 23: Cable Television Information Center. Status Report on Two- Way Testbeds. Washington, D.C., May 1973.
• 24: Callais, R.T. Subscriber Response system Progress Report. Theta-Com, 2216 W. Peoria Ave., Phoenix, AZ 18068, June 1973.

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY

General Terms:
Human Factors, Management

Keywords:
community information utilities, public policy, social implications