ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Dynamic document processing
Full text PdfPdf (1.07 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 15 ,  Issue 7  (July 1972) table of contents
Pages: 658 - 668  
Year of Publication: 1972
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Gerard Salton  Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/361454.361509
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The current role of computers in automatic document processing is briefly outlined, and some reasons are given why the early promise of library automation and of the mechanization of documentation processes has not been fulfilled. A new dynamic document environment is then outlined in which clustered files are searched and information is retrieved following an interactive user-controlled search process. Methods are described for an automatic query modification based on user needs, and for a continuous reorganization of the stored information as a function of earlier file processing and of normal collection growth. The proposed procedures provide powerful tools for information retrieval and for the control of dynamic library collections in which new items are continually added and ones are retired.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Salton, G. Computers and libraries--a reply. Library J. 96, 18 (Oct. 1971), 3277-3282.
 
2
Locke, W.N. Computer costs for large libraries. Datamation 16, 2 (Feb. 1970), 69-74.
 
3
Vickery, B.C. Techniques of Information Retrieval. Archon Books, Hamden, Conn., 1970.
 
4
Salton, G. Automatic text analysis. Science 168, 17 (Apr. 1970), 335-343.
 
5
Swanson, D.R. Searching natural language text by computer. Science 132, 21 (Oct. 1960), 1099-1104.
 
6
 
7
Salton, G. A new comparison between conventional indexing (Medlars) and automatic text processing (SMART). J. ASIS 23, 2 (Mar.-Apr. 1972).
 
8
Lancaster, F.W. Evaluation of the operating efficiency of Medlars. Final Rep., 1968. Nat. Library of Medicine.
 
9
Lancaster, F.W. An evaluation of EARS (Epilepsy Abstracts Retrieval System) and factors governing its effectiveness. Report to N1NDS. U. of Illinois, Oct. 1971.
 
10
 
11
Salton, G. Search strategy and the optimization of retrieval effectiveness. In Mechanized Information Storage, Retrieval, and Dissemination. K. Samuelson, Ed. North Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1968, pp. 73-107.
 
12
 
13
Lesk, M.E., and Salton, G. Interactive search and retrieval methods using automatic information displays. Proc. AFIPS SJCC, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1969, pp. 435--446.
 
14
Salton, G. The performance of interactive information retrieval. Information Processing Letters 1, (1971), 35--41.
 
15
Brauen, T.L. Document vector modification. In The SMART Retrieval System--Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. G. Salton, Ed. Ch. 24, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971, pp. 456--484.
 
16
 
17
Johnson, D.B., and Lafuente, J.M. A controlled single-pass classification algorithm with application to multilevel clustering. Scientific Report No. ISR-18, Section XII, Dept. of Computer Science, Cornell U., Oct. 1970.
 
18
Lesser, V.R. A modified two-level search algorithm using request clustering. Scientific Report N. ISR-11, Section VII, Dept. of Computer Science, Cornell U., June 1966.
 
19
Worona, S. Query clustering in a large document space. In The SMART Retrieval System--Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. G. Salton, Ed. Ch. 13, Prentiec-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 298-310.
 
20
Burton, R.E., and Kebler, R.W. The half-life of some scientific and technical literatures. American Documentation 11 (1960), 18-22.
 
21
Sandison, A. The use of older literature and its obseolescene. J Documentation 27, 3 (Sept. 1971), 167-183.
 
22
Grant, R.S. Predicting the need for multiple copies of books. J. Library Automation 4, 2 (June 1971).
 
23
Brookes, B.C. Obsolescence of special library periodicals: Sampling errors and utility contours J. ASIS (Sept.-Oct. 1970), 320-329.
 
24
Brookes, B.C. The growth, utility and obsolescence of scientific periodical literature. J. Documentation 26, 4 (Dec. 1970), 283-294.
 
25
Sage, C.R., Anderson, R.R., and Fitzwater, D.R. Adaptive information dissemination. Am. Documentation 16, 3 (July 1965), 185-200.
 
26
Kelly, J. Negative response relevance feedback. In The SMART Retrieval System--Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. G. Salton, Ed. Ch. 20, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1971, pp. 403--411.
 
27
Salton, G. Experiments in automatic thesaurus construction. Proc. IFIP Congress 71. In Information Processing 71, North Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1972.