ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Reduction: a method of proving properties of parallel programs
Full text PdfPdf (453 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 18 ,  Issue 12  (December 1975) table of contents
Pages: 717 - 721  
Year of Publication: 1975
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Richard J. Lipton  Yale Univ., New Haven, CT
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 36,   Downloads (12 Months): 131,   Citation Count: 53
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/361227.361234
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

When proving that a parallel program has a given property it is often convenient to assume that a statement is indivisible, i.e. that the statement cannot be interleaved with the rest of the program. Here sufficient conditions are obtained to show that the assumption that a statement is indivisible can be relaxed and still preserve properties such as halting. Thus correctness proofs of a parallel system can often be greatly simplified.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ashcroft, E.A. Proving assertions about parallel programs. Research Rep. CS-73-01, Dep. of Applied Analysis and Computer Sci., U. of Waterloo, 1973.
 
2
Dijkstra, E.W. Cooperating sequential processes. In ProgrammingLanguages, F. Genuys (Ed.), Academic Press, 1968, pp. 43- 112.
 
3
Floyd, R.W. Assigning meanings to programs. In Mathematical Aspects of Computer Science, Amer. Math. Soc., 1967, pp. 19-32.
4
 
5
 
6
Levitt, K.N, The application of program proving techniques to the verification of synchronization processes. AFIPS Conf. Proc., Vol. 41, Part 1, 1972 Fall Joint Computer Conference, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1972, pp. 33-47.

CITED BY  53