ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scheduling independent tasks to reduce mean finishing time
Full text PdfPdf (559 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 7  (July 1974) table of contents
Pages: 382 - 387  
Year of Publication: 1974
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
J. Bruno  Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park
E. G. Coffman, Jr.  Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park
R. Sethi  Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 104,   Citation Count: 37
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/361011.361064
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Sequencing to minimize mean finishing time (or mean time in system) is not only desirable to the user, but it also tends to minimize at each point in time the storage required to hold incomplete tasks. In this paper a deterministic model of independent tasks is introduced and new results are derived which extend and generalize the algorithms known for minimizing mean finishing time. In addition to presenting and analyzing new algorithms it is shown that the most general mean-finishing-time problem for independent tasks is polynomial complete, and hence unlikely to admit of a non-enumerative solution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Conway, R.W., Maxwell, W.L., and Miller, L.W. Theorv ol" Scheduling. Addison-Wesley, New York, 1900.
 
2
Ford, L.R., and Fulkerson, D.R. Flows in Networks. Princeton U. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1962.
 
3
Bruno, J. A scheduling algorithm for minimizing mean flow time. Tech. Rep. #141, Comput. Sci. Dept., Penn State U., University Park, Penna., July 1973.
4
 
5
Karp, R.M. Reducibility between combinatorial problems. In Complexity o/Computer Computations, R.E. Milker and J.W. Thatcher (Eds) Plenum Press, New York 1972, pp. 85-103.
 
6
Sahni, S. Some related problems from network flows, game theory and integer programming. 13th Ann. Syrup. on Switching and Automata Theory, Oct. 1972, pp. 130-139.
 
7
Ullman, J.D. Polynomial complete scheduling problems TR9. Dept. of Comput. Sci., U. of California at Berkeley, Mar. 1973.
 
8
Graham, R.L. Bounds for certain multiprocessing anomalies. Bell Syst. Tech J. (Nov. 1966), 1563-1581.
 
9
Graham, R.L. Bounds on multiprocessing timing anomalies. SIAM J. Appl. Math 17, 2 (Mar. 1969), 416-429.
 
10
Coffman, E.G. On a conjecture concerning the comparison of SPT and LPT scheduling. Tech. Rep. #140, Comput. Sci. Dept., Penn State U., University Park, Penna., July 1973.

CITED BY  37

Collaborative Colleagues:
J. Bruno: colleagues
E. G. Coffman, Jr.: colleagues
R. Sethi: colleagues