ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Combining decision rules in a decision table
Full text PdfPdf (391 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 18 ,  Issue 8  (August 1975) table of contents
Pages: 476 - 480  
Year of Publication: 1975
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Keith Shwayder  Samsonite Corp., Denver, CO
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 55,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/360933.360997
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The techniques for minimizing logic circuits are applied to the simplification of decision tables by the combining of decision rules. This method is logically equivalent to the Quine-McCluskey method for finding prime implicants. If some of the decision rules implied in the ELSE Rule occur with low frequency, then the ELSE Rule can be used to further simplify the decision table. Several objectives merit consideration in optimizing a decision table: reducing machine execution time; reducing preprocessing time; reducing required machine memory; reducing the number of decision rules. (This often improves the clarity of the decision table to a human reader.) It will be shown that objectives (3) and (4) can be furthered with the above methods. Objective (1) is also attained if overspecified decision rules are not combined. Objective (2) must be compared against the potential benefits of objectives (1), (3), and (4) in deciding whether to use the above methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Armerding, G.W. FORTAB: A decision table language for scientific computing applications. Rand Corp., RM-3306-PR, Sept. 1962.
2
 
3
Dixon, P. Decision tables and their application. Computers and Automation 13, 4 (Apr. 1964), 14-19.
4
5
 
6
King, P.J.H. Decision tables. The Computer J. 10, 8 (Aug. 1967), 135-142.
7
 
8
McDaniel, H. (Ed.) Decision Table Software. Auerbach, New York, 1970.
 
9
Mendelson, E. Boolean Algebra & Switching Circuits. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.
 
10
Pollack, S.L. How to build and analyze decision tables. Rand Corp. Memo, P-2829, Nov. 1963.
 
11
Pollack, S.L. CODASYL, COBOL and DETAB-X, Datamation 9, 2 (Feb. 1963), 61.
12
 
13
Pollack, S.L., Hicks, H.T., Jr., and Harrison, W.J., Decision Tables: Theory and Practice. Wiley, New York, 1971.
14
 
15
Prather, R.E. Introduction to Switching Theory: A Mathematical Approach. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1967.
16
17
 
18
Schmidt, D.T., and Kavanagh, T.F. Using decision structure tables. Datamation, 10, (Feb.-Mar. 1964).
 
19
Schubert, E.J. The relative merits of minimization techniques for switching circuits. IEEE-EC-12 (1963), 321-322.
20
21
22