ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A comparison of simulation event list algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (776 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 18 ,  Issue 4  (April 1975) table of contents
Pages: 223 - 230  
Year of Publication: 1975
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Jean G. Vaucher  Univ. de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Pierre Duval  Univ. de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 31,   Citation Count: 36
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/360715.360758
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Four algorithms are considered which can be used to schedule events in a general purpose discrete simulation system. Two of the algorithms are new, one is based on an end-order tree structure for event notices, and another uses an indexed linear list. The algorithms are tested with a set of typical stochastic scheduling distributions especially chosen to show the advantages and limitations of the algorithms. The end-order tree algorithm is shown to be an advantageous, immediate replacement for the algorithm in use with current simulation languages. The most promising algorithm uses the indexed list concept. It will require an adaptive routine before it can be employed in general purpose simulators, but its performance is such that further study would be fruitful.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Buxton, J.N. (Ed.) Simulation Programming Languages. North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1968.
 
2
 
3
Genuys, F. (Ed.) Programming Languages. Academic Press, New York, 1968, pp. 349-395.
 
4
 
5
Kiviat, P.J., Villanueva, R., and Markowitz, H.H. The SIMSCRIPT I1 Programming Language. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1968.
 
6
 
7
Myhrhaug, B. Sequencing set efficiency. Pub. A9, Norwegian Computing Centre, Forskningsveien, 1B, Oslo 3.
 
8
Nance, R.W. On time flow mechanisms for discrete system simulation. Management Sci. 18 (Sept. 1971), 59-73.
 
9
Pritsker, A.A., and Kiviat, P.J. Simulation with GASP II. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1969.
10
11
12
 
13
Wirth, N. The programming language PASCAL. Acta lnformatica (Jan 1971).
 
14
General Purpose Simulation System 360--User's Manual Pub. H20-0326, IBM Corp., White Plain, N.Y., 1968.

CITED BY  36

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jean G. Vaucher: colleagues
Pierre Duval: colleagues