ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
State-space problem-reduction, and theorem proving—some relationships
Full text PdfPdf (840 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 18 ,  Issue 2  (February 1975) table of contents
Pages: 107 - 119  
Year of Publication: 1975
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Gordon J. VanderBrug  Univ. of Maryland, College Park
Jack Minker  Univ. of Maryland, College Park
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/360666.360672
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper suggests a bidirectional relationship between state-space and problem-reduction representations. It presents a formalism based on multiple-input and multiple-output operators which provides a basis for viewing the two types of representations in this manner. A representation of the language recognition problem which is based on the Cocke parsing algorithm is used as an illustration. A method for representing problems in first-order logic in such a way that the inference system employed by a resolution-based theorem prover determines whether the set of clauses is interpreted in the state-space mode or in the problem-reduction mode is presented. The analogous concepts in problem-reduction and theorem proving, and the terminology used to refer to them, are noted. The relationship between problem-reduction, input resolution, and linear resolution is is discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Chang, C.L., and Slagle, J.R. An admissible and optimal algorithm for searching AND/OR graphs Artificial Intelligence J. 2, 2 (Fall 1971), 117-128.
 
3
 
4
Ernst, G.W., and Newell, A. GPS--A Case Study in Generalit), and Problem Solving, Academic Press, New York, 1969.
 
5
Fikes, R.E., and Nilsson, N.J. STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence. 2, (197l), 189-208.
 
6
Green, C.C. Application of theorem proving to problem solving. In: Proc. Intern. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, D.E. Walker and L.M. Norton (eds.), Washington, D.C., 1969, pp. 219-239.
 
7
Hewitt, C. Description and theoretical analysis (using schemata) of planner: A language for proving theorem and manipulating models in a robot. AI TR-258, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1972.
 
8
Kowalski, R. Search strategies for theorem proving. In Machine Intelligence 5, B. Meltzer and D. Michie (eds.), American Elsevier, New York, 1970, pp. 181-200.
 
9
Kowalski, R. "AND-OR graphs, theorem-proving graphs and hi-directional search. In Machine Intelligence 7, B. Meltzer and D. Michie (eds.), American Elsevier, New York, 1973.
 
10
Kowalski, R. Predicate logic as programming language. Memo No. 20, U. of Edinburgh, Dep. of Computational Logic; also Proc. of IFIP Congress 1974.
 
11
Kowalski, R., and Kuehner, D. Linear resolution with selection function. Artificial Intelligence J. 2, 3/4 (Winter 1971), 221- 260.
 
12
Kuehner, D. Some special purpose resolution systems. In Machine Intelligence 7, B. Meltzer and D. Michie (eds.), American Elsevier, New York, 1973, pp. 117-128.
 
13
Loveland, D.W. A linear format for resolution. In Proc. IRIA 1968 Syrup. Auto. Demonstration, Lecture Notes on Math., no. 125, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970,
 
14
Loveland, D.W., and Stickel, M.E. A hole in goal trees: Some guidance from resolution theory. Proc. Third Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Stanford, Calif., 1973, pp. 153-161.
 
15
Luckham, D. Refinement theorems in resolution theory. In Proc. IRIA 1968 Syrup. Auto. Demonstration, Lecture Notes on Math., no. 125, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970.
16
 
17
Minker, J., McSkimin, J.R., and Fishman, D.H. MRPPS-- An interactive refutation proof procedure system for questionanswering, lnternat. J. of Comput. and htJbrm. Sci. 3, 2, 1974.
 
18
Minker, J., and VanderBrug, G.J. Representations of the language recognition problem for a theorem prover. U. of Marylang TR- 199, Sept. 1972; to appear in lnternat. J. of Comput. and bffbrm. Sci. 3, 3, 1974.
 
19
 
20
Pohl, I. Bi-directional search. In Machhle bltelligenee 6, B. Meltzer and D. Michie (eds.), American Elsevier, New York, 1971, pp. 127-140.
 
21
Raphael, B. The frame problem in problem-solving systems. In Artificial Intelligence and Heuristic Programming, N.V. Findler and B. Meltzer (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971, pp. 159- 169.
 
22
Robinson, J.A. Automatic deduction with hyperresolution. Internat. J. of Comput. Math. 1, 3 (1965), 227-234.
 
23
Robinson, J.l., and Marks, S.L. A system for automatic analysis of English text. RM-4654-PR, The RAND Corp., Sept. 1965.
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gordon J. VanderBrug: colleagues
Jack Minker: colleagues