ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Hierarchical geometric models for visible surface algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (891 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 19 ,  Issue 10  (October 1976) table of contents
Pages: 547 - 554  
Year of Publication: 1976
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
James H. Clark  Univ. of California, Santa Cruz
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 113,   Citation Count: 131
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/360349.360354
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The geometric structure inherent in the definition of the shapes of three-dimensional objects and environments is used not just to define their relative motion and placement, but also to assist in solving many other problems of systems for producing pictures by computer. By using an extension of traditional structure information, or a geometric hierarchy, five significant improvements to current techniques are possible. First, the range of complexity of an environment is greatly increased while the visible complexity of any given scene is kept within a fixed upper limit. Second, a meaningful way is provided to vary the amount of detail presented in a scene. Third, “clipping” becomes a very fast logarithmic search for the resolvable parts of the environment within the field of view. Fourth, frame to frame coherence and clipping define a graphical “working set,” or fraction of the total structure that should be present in primary store for immediate access by the visible surface algorithm. Finally, the geometric structure suggests a recursive descent, visible surface algorithm in which the computation time potentially grows linearly with the visible complexity of the scene.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Computer Aided Operations and Research Facility, U.S. Maritime Service Simulator (principal contractor Philco-Ford, visible-surface processor by Evans and Sutherland Comptr. Corp.).
 
3
Catmull, E. A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces. Tech. Rep. UTEC-CSc-74-133, U. of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, Dec. 1974.
4
 
5
 
6
Crow, F.C., and Bui-Tuong Phong. Improved Rendition of Polygonal Models of Curved Surfaces. Proc. Second USAJapan Comptr. Conf., Aug. 1975, p. 475.
7
8
 
9
Electonic scene generator expansion system. Final Rep., NASA Contract NAS 9-11065, Defense Electronic Div., General Electric Corp., Syracuse, N.Y., Dec. 1971.
 
10
Gouraud, H. Computer display of curved surfaces. IEEE Trans. Computers C-20 (June 1971), 623.
 
11
Nasa-Ames Short Take-off and Landing Simulator (built by Evans and Sutherland Comptr. Corp.).
 
12
New York Inst. Tech., Comptr. Animation Dep.
 
13
14
15
 
16
Rediflow Flight Simulation, Ltd., NOVOVIEW Visual Systems (video system provided by E&S Comptr. Corp.).
 
17
 
18
Schumacker, R.A., Brand, B., Gilliland, M., and Sharp, W. Study for applying computer-generated images to visual simulations. AFHRL-TR-69-74, US Air Force Human Resources Lab., Washington, D.C., Sept. 1969.
 
19
Sutherland, I.E. Sketchpad: a man-machine graphical communication system. TR 296, M.I.T Lincoln Labs, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass., Jan. 1963.
20
 
21
 
22
Wipke, T., et al. Computer Representation and Manipulation of Chemical Information. Wylie Interscience, New York, 1974.
 
23
Wylie, C., Romney, R.S., Evans, D.C., and Erdahl, A. Halftone perspective drawings by computer. Proc. AFIPS 1967 FJCC, Vol. 31, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 49-58.

CITED BY  131