Experimental investigations of the utility of detailed flowcharts in programming

ABSTRACT

This paper describes previous research on flowcharts and a series of controlled experiments to test the utility of detailed flowcharts as an aid to program composition, comprehension, debugging, and modification. No statistically significant difference between flowchart and nonflowchart groups has been shown, thereby calling into question the utility of detailed flowcharting. A program of further research is suggested.

REFERENCES

• 1: Robert J. Rossheim, Report on proposed American standard flowchart symbols for information processing, Communications of the ACM, v.6 n.10, p.599-604, Oct. 1963 [doi>10.1145/367651.367657]
• 2: Joel D. Aron, Program Development Process: The Individual Programmer, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1974
• 3: Bohl, M. Flowcharting Techniques. Science Research Associates, Chicago, 1971, p. 53.
• 4: Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.), Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1995
• 5: Chapin, N. New format for flowcharts. Software: Practice and Experience 4, 4 (1974), 341-357.
• 6: Farina, F. Flowcharting. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970, iii.
• 7: Goldstein, H.H., and von Neumann, J. Planning and coding problems for an electronic computing instrument, part II, vol I. Rep. prepared for the U.S. Army Ordinance Dept., 1947. Reprinted in von Neumann, J. Collected Works, Vol. V, A.H. Taub, Ed., Mc- Millan, New York, pp. 80-151.
• 8: Kammann, R. The comprehensibility of printed instructions and the flowchart alternative. Human Factors 17, 2 (1975), 183-191.
• 9: Ledgard, H., and Chmura, L. COBOL with Style. Hayden, Rochelle Park, N.J., 1976.
• 10: Lewis, B.N., Horabin, I.S., and Gane, C.P. Flowcharts, Logical Trees and Algorithms for Rules and Regulations. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London, 1967.
• 11: Mayer, R.E. Different problem-solving competencies established in learning computer programming with and without meaningful models. J. Educ. Psych. 67, 6 (1975), 725-734.
• 12: I. Nassi , B. Shneiderman, Flowchart techniques for structured programming, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.8 n.8, p.12-26, August 1973 [doi>10.1145/953349.953350]
• 13: Shiffrin, R.M. Memory search. In Models of Human Memory, D.A. Norman, Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1970.
• 14: Shneiderman, B. Experimental testing in programming languages, stylistic considerations and design techniques. Proc. AFIPS NCC, 1975 AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1975, pp. 653-656.
• 15: Shneiderman, B. Exploratory experiments in programmer behavior. Int. J. Comptr. and Inform. Sci. 5, 2 (June 1976), 123-143.
• 16: Shneiderman, B., and Mayer, R. Syntactic/semantic interactions in programmer behavior: a model and experimental results (unpublished).
• 17: John R. Sturgul , M. J. Merchant, Applied FORTRAN IV Programming, PWS Publishing Co., Boston, MA, 1977
• 18: Tulving, E. Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words. Psych. Rev. 69 (1962), 344-354.
• 19: G. M. Weinberg, The psychology of computer programming, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY, 1988
• 20: Wright, P., and Reid, F. Written information: some alternatives to prose for expressing the outcomes of complex contingencies. J. Appl. Psych. 57, 2 (1973), 160-166.

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
debugging, experimental testing, flowcharts, human factors, modification, program composition, program comprehension