ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Value conflicts and social choice in electronic funds transfer system developments
Full text PdfPdf (2.01 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 21 ,  Issue 8  (August 1978) table of contents
Pages: 642 - 657  
Year of Publication: 1978
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Rob Kling  Univ. of California, Irvine
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 23
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/359576.359580
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

During the last few years, computer-based systems which automate the transfer and recording of debits and credits have begun to be implemented on a large scale. These systems promise both financial benefits for the institutions that use them and potential conveniences to their customers. However, they also raise significant social, legal, and technical questions that must be resolved if full scale systems for Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) are not to cause more problems for the larger public than they solve. This paper examines the incentives for EFT developments and the social problems they raise in the context of conflicts between five different value positions that are often implicit in analyses of proposed EFT arrangements. These conflicts reflect the relative importance of certain problems for specific groups. The value positions implicit in EFT proposals help to organize analyses of market arrangements, system reliability, and privacy of transactions. These topics are analyzed in this article and related to the value positions held by concerned parties. Last, the ways in which the public can learn about the social qualities of different EFT arrangements and the pace of EFT developments are both discussed in the context of social choice.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A retreat from the cashless society. Business Week (April 18, 1977), 80-90.
 
2
Allen, B. The embezzler's guide to computer systems. Harvard Business Rev. 53 (July-Aug. 1975), 79-89.
 
3
Arthur D. Little, Inc. The consequences of electronic funds transfer--A technology assessment of movement towards a less cash/less check society. Rep. C-76397, Cambridge, Mass., Jan. 1975.
 
4
Backman, F. Are computers ready for the checkless society? Proc. AFIPS 1976 NCC, Vol. 45, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 147-156.
 
5
Balderston, F.E., Carman, J., and Hoggatt, A. Computers in banking and marketing. Science 195 (March 18, 1977), 1115-1118.
 
6
Belair, R. Less government secrecy and more personal privacy? Experience with the federal freedom of information and privacy acts. The Civil Liverties Rev. 4, 1 (May/June 1977), 10-19.
 
7
Benton, J. Electronic funds transfer: pifalls and payoffs. Harvard Business Rev. 55 (July-Aug. 1977), 16-19, 28-29, 164-173.
 
8
Blair, J.M. Economic concentration: Structure, Behaviour, and Public Policy. Harcourt, Brace Javanovich, New York, 1972.
 
9
Boehne, E. The Fed's job is getting harder. Financial Sect., New York Times, July 21, 1974.
 
10
Bunce, R. Television in the Corporate Interest. Praeger, New York, 1976.
 
11
Clayton, R.E. Electronic funds transfer is coming. Banking 65 (Sept. 1972), 42-46.
 
12
Cox, E.B., and Giese, P. Now it's the "less-check society." Harvard Business Rev. 50 (Nov.-Dec. 1972), 6-18.
 
13
Dowling, R. Congress urged to enact access curbs before EFT development. American Banker CXLL 209 (Oct. 27, 1976), 1, 24.
 
14
Eichner, A. The Megacorp and Oligopoly: Micro Foundations of Macro Dynamics. Cambridge U. Press, New York, 1976.
 
15
Ege, S.M. Electronics funds transfer: A survey of problems and prospects in 1975. Maryland Law Rev. 35, 1 (1975), 3-56.
 
16
Ellul, J. The Technological Society. Knopf, New York, 1964.
 
17
Ernst, M. An assessment of the less cash/less check technology. Rep. C-76397, Arthur D. Little, Cambridge, Mass., April 1974.
 
18
Federal Reserve Board. Evolution of the payments mechanism. Federal Reserve Bull. 58 (3) (Dec. 1972), 1009-1012.
 
19
Federal Reserve Bank o( Boston. The economics of a national electronic funds transfer system. Conf. Ser. No. 13, Boston, Mass., Oct. 1974.
 
20
Fogel, R.W. Railroads and American Economic Growth. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Md., 1964.
 
21
Freeman, D. Technology and Society: Issues in Assessment, Conflict and Choice. Rand McNally, Chicago, Ill., 1974.
 
22
Goodpaster, K., and Sayre, K. An ethical analysis of powercompany decision-making. In Values in the Electric Power Industry, K. Sayre, Ed., U. of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Ind., 1977.
 
23
Gregory, F. The privacy issue--A reply. Records Manage. Quart. 11, 1 (Jan. 1977), 7-9.
24
 
25
Hiltz, S.R., and Turoff, M. EFT and social stratification in the USA: More inequality? Telecommunications Policy 2, (March 1978), 22-31.
 
26
Hoffman, L. Modern Methods for Computer Security and Privacy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, N.J., 1977.
 
27
Holmes, E. Privacy backers hit HEW project: Work, welfare rolls matched. Computerword XI, 47 (Nov. 21, 1977), i,8.
 
28
Jurgen, D., and Ernst, M. Electronic funds transfer: Too much, too soon7 IEEE Spectrum 14, 5 (May 1977), 51-57.
 
29
Kaufman, G. Money, the Financial System, and the Economy. Rand McNally, Chicago, Ill., 1973.
 
30
King, J., and Kraemer, K. Electronic funds transfer as a subject of study in technology, society and public policy. Telecommunications Policy 2, 1 (March 1978), 13-21.
 
31
Kinsley, M. Outer Space and Inner Sanctums: Government, Business, and Satellite Communication. Wiley, New York, 1976.
32
 
33
Kling, R. Passing the digital buck: Unresolved social and technical issues in electronics funds transfer systems. TR#87, Inform. and Comptr. Sci. Dept., U. of California, Irvine, CaliL, June 1976.
34
35
 
36
Kling, R., and Gerson, E. The social dynamics of technical innovation in the computing world. Symbolic Interaction 1, 1 (Dec. 1977), 132-146.
 
37
Kling, R. Information systems and policymaking: Computer technology and organizational arrangements. Telecommunications Policy 2, 6 (March 1978), 22-32.
 
38
Kling, R. EFT and the quality of life. Proc. AFIPS 1978 NCC, Vol. 47, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J. pp. 191-197.
 
39
Kraemer, K., King, J., and Colton, C. Towards an agenda for EFT research. Computers and Society 8, 2 (Summer 1977), 3-11.
 
40
Lawless, E. Technology and Social Shock. Rutgers U. Press, New Brunswick, N.J., 1977.
 
41
Linde, R.R. Operating system penetration. Proc. AFIPS 1975 NCC, Vol. 44, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1975, pp. 361-368.
 
42
Linstone, H.A., and Simmonds, W.C. Futures Research: New Directions. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1977.
 
43
Long, R.H. Discussion Paper. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. The economics of a national electronics funds transfer system. Conf. Set. No. 13, Boston, Mass., Oct. 1974, pp. 32-38.
 
44
Long, R.H. EFT systems, banking, and regulation J: A report by the ACT Division of BAI. Bank Administration Inst., Park Ridge, Ill., 1974.
 
45
Lovati, J.M. The changing competition between commercial banks and thrift institutions for deposits. Bulletin, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (July 1975), 2-8.
 
46
Mansfield, E. Microeconomics. Norton, New York, Sec. ed., 1975.
 
47
Mazzetti, J.P. Design considerations for electronic funds transfer switch development. Proc. AFIPS 1976, NCC, Vol. 45, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1976, pp. 139-146.
48
 
49
Mintz, M., and Cohen, J. Power, Inc. Viking Press, New York, 1976.
 
50
National Commission on Electronic Fund Transfers. EFT and the Public Interest. U.S. Gov't. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Feb. 1977.
 
51
National Commission on Electronic Fund Transfers. EFT in the United States: Policy Recommendations and the Public Interest. U.S. Gov't. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Oct. 1977.
 
52
NoU, R. Reforming Regulation. The Brookings Inst., Washington, D.C., 1971.
 
53
Parker, D.B. Crime by Computer. Scribners, New York, 1976.
 
54
Peterson, H.E., and Turn, R. System implications of information privacy. Proc. AFIPS 1967 SJCC, Vol. 30, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 291-300.
 
55
Portway, P.S. EFT systems? No thanks, not yet. Computerworld 12, 2 (Jan. 9, 1978), 14--16, 21, 23-25.
 
56
Privacy Protection Study Commission. Personal Privacy in an Information Society. U.S. Gov't. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., July, 1977.
 
57
Prives, D. The explosion of state laws on electronic fund transfer systems. P-76-1, Prog. Inform. Technologies and Public Policy, Harvard U., Cambridge, Mass., 1976.
 
58
Reid, S. The New Industrial Order: Concentration Regulation and Public Policy. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976.
 
59
Richardson, D.W. Electric Money:. Evolution of an Electronic Funds-Transfer System. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970.
 
60
Rose, S. More bang for the buck: The magic of electronic banking. Fortune 95, 5 (1977), 202-226.
 
61
Rossman, L.W. Financial industry sees EFT privacy laws adequate. American Banker CXLL 210 (Oct. 28, 1976), 1, 11.
 
62
Rule, J. Private Lives and Public Surveillance. Schocken Books, New York, 1974.
 
63
Rule, J. Value Choices in Electronic Funds Transfer Policy. Office of Telecommunications Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C., Oct. 1975.
 
64
Saltzer, J., and Schroeder, M. The protection of information in computer systems. Proc. IEEE 65, 9 (Sept. 1975), 1278-1308.
 
65
Sayre, K., Ed. Values in the Electric Power Industry. U. of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Ind., 1977.
 
66
Schick, B. Some impacts of electronic funds transfer on consumer transactions. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. The economics of a national electronics funds transfer system. Conf. Ser. No. 13, Boston, Mass., Oct. 1974, pp. 165-179.
 
67
Schuck, P.H. Electronic funds transfer: A technology in search of a market. Maryland Law Review 35, 1 (1975), 74--87.
 
68
Schultze, L. The public use of the private interest. Harpers 254, 1524 (May 1977), 43-62.
69
 
70
Steifel, R.C. A checkless society or an unchecked society? Computers and Automation 19 (Oct. 1970), 32-35.
 
71
Sterling, T., and Laudon, K. Humanizing information systems. Datamation 22, 12 (Dec. 1976), 53-59.
 
72
The time is NOW. Forbes Magazine 120, 1 (July 1, 1977), 61-62.
 
73
Turoff, M., and Mitroff, I. A case study of technology assessment applied to the "cashless society" concept. Technol. Forecasting Soc., Change 7 (1975), 317-325.
 
74
Weissman, C. Secure computer operation with virtual machine partitioning. Proc. AFIPS 1975 NCC, Vol. 44, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1975, pp. 929-934.
 
75
U.S. Dept. HEW, Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems. Records Computers, and the Rights of Citizens. Washington, D.C., 1973.
 
76
Walker, G. M. Electronic funds transfer systems. Electronics (July 24, 1975), 79-85.
 
77
Webber, M. The BART experience--What have we learned? The Public Interest, Vol. 45 (Fall 1976), 79-108.
 
78
 
79
Wessel, M. Freedom's Edge: The Computer Threat to Society. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1974.
 
80
Westin, A., and Baker, M. Databanks in a Free Society. Quadrangle Books, New York, 1972.
 
81
Whiteside, T. Computer Capers. Crowell, New York, 1978.
 
82
Wilcox, C., and Shepard, W. Public Policies Towards Business. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Fifth ed., 1975.
 
83
Winner, L. Autonomous Technology: Technology Out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1977.
 
84
Wise, D. The American Police State. Random House, New York, 1976.

CITED BY  23