ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Characteristics of application software maintenance
Full text PdfPdf (578 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 21 ,  Issue 6  (June 1978) table of contents
Pages: 466 - 471  
Year of Publication: 1978
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
B. P. Lientz  Univ. of California, Los Angeles
E. B. Swanson  Univ. of California, Los Angeles
G. E. Tompkins  Univ. of California, Los Angeles
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 31,   Downloads (12 Months): 207,   Citation Count: 45
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/359511.359522
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Maintenance and enhancement of application software consume a major portion of the total life cycle cost of a system. Rough estimates of the total systems and programming resources consumed range as high as 75-80 percent in each category. However, the area has been given little attention in the literature. To analyze the problems in this area a questionnaire was developed and pretested. It was then submitted to 120 organizations. Respondents totaled 69. Responses were analyzed with the SPSS statistical package. The results of the analysis indicate that: (1) maintenance and enhancement do consume much of the total resources of systems and programming groups; (2) maintenance and enhancement tend to be viewed by management as at least somewhat more important than new application software development; (3) in maintenance and enhancement, problems of a management orientation tend to be more significant than those of a technical orientation; and (4) user demands for enhancements and extension constitute the most important management problem area.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Belady, L.A., and Lehman, M.M. A model of large program development. IBM Syst. J. 3 (1976),
 
2
Boehm, B.W. The high cost of software. Proc Symp on High Cost of Software, Monterey, Calif., 1973, pp. 27--40.
 
3
 
4
Boehm, B.W. Software engineering. IEEE Trans. Comptrs. C-25 (Dec. 1976), 1226-1241.
 
5
Brantley, C.L., and Osajima, Y.R. Continuing development of centrally developed and maintained software systems. IEEE Comptr. Soc. Proc. 45 (Spring 1975), 285-288.
6
7
 
8
Ditri, A.E., Shaw, J.C., and Atkins, W. Managing the EDP Function. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.
 
9
Elshoff, J.L. An analysis of some commercial PL/I programs. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. SE-2 (June 1976, 113-120.
 
10
 
11
Gunderman, R.E. A glimpse into program maintenance. Datamation 19 (June 1973), 99-101.
 
12
Implications of Using Modular Programming. Guide No. 1, Hoskyns Syst. Res., J. Hoskyns and Co., London, 1973.
 
13
Khan, Z. How to tackle the systems maintenance dilemma. Canadian Data Syst. (March 1975), 30-32.
 
14
Kosy, D.W. Air Force command and control information processing in the 1980's: Trends in software technology. U.S. Air Force Proj. RAND, RAND Corp., Santa Monica, Calif., June 1974, p. 70.
 
15
Lientz, B.P., Swanson, E.B., and Tompkins, G.E. Maintenance questionnaire and list of respondents. Tech. Rep., 1976; available from authors, U. of California at Los Angeles.
 
16
Lindhorst, W.M. Scheduled maintenance of applications software. Datamation 19 (May 1973), 87-89.
 
17
lClooney, J.W. Organization program maintenance. Datamation 21 (Feb. 1975), 63-66.
 
18
Nie, N.H., et al. SPSS McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
 
19
Program maintenance: User's view. Data Processing 7 (Sept.-Oct. 1973), I-4.
 
20
Riggs, R. Computer system maintenance. Datamation 15 (Nov. 1969), 227-235.
 
21
Sterns, S. Experience with centralized maintenance of a large application system. IEEE Comptr. Society Proc. 45 (Spring, 1975), 297-302.
 
22
 
23
Canning, R. That maintenance iceberg. In EDP Analyzer, Vol. 10, No. 10 Canning Pub., Vista, Calif., Oct. 1972.

CITED BY  45

Collaborative Colleagues:
B. P. Lientz: colleagues
E. B. Swanson: colleagues
G. E. Tompkins: colleagues