ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Management utilization of computers in American local governments
Full text PdfPdf (1.50 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 21 ,  Issue 3  (March 1978) table of contents
Pages: 206 - 218  
Year of Publication: 1978
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
William H. Dutton  Public Policy Research Organization, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA
Kenneth L. Kraemer  Univ. of California, Irvine, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/359361.359364
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Traditional concepts of management information systems (MIS) bear little relation to the information systems currently in use by top management in most US local governments. What exists is management-oriented computing, involving the use of relatively unsophisticated applications. Despite the unsophisticated nature of these systems, management use of computing is surprisingly common, but also varied in its extent among local governments. Management computing is most prevalent in those governments with professional management practices where top management is supportive of computing and tends to control computing decisions and where department users have less control over design and implementation activities. Finally, management computing clearly has impacts for top managers, mostly involving improvements in decision information.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ackoff, R. Management misinformation systems. Manage. Sci. II, 4 (Dec. 1967), B147-156.
 
2
Adams, C.R. How management users view information systems. Decision Sci. 6, 2 (April 1975), 337-345.
 
3
Argyris, C. Management information systems: the challenge to rationality and emotionality. Manage. Rev. 17, 6 (1971) B275- B292.
4
 
5
Bingham, R.D. Innovation in local government: The case of public housing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago, 1975.
 
6
Blumenthal, S.C. Management Information Systems: A Framework for Planning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1969.
7
 
8
Braybrooke, D., and Lindblom, C.E. A Strategy of Decision. The Free Press, New York, 1963.
 
9
Brewer, G. Politicians, Bureaucrats and Consultants. Basic Books, New York, 1974.
 
10
Crecine, J.P. Governmental Problem Solving: A Computer Simulation of Municipal Budgeting. Rand McNally, Chicago, 1969.
11
 
12
Downs, A. A realistic look at the final payoffs from urban data systems. Public Admin. Rev. 27, 3 (1967), pp. 204-210.
 
13
Gorry, G.A., and Morton, M.S. A framework for management information systems. Sloan Manag. Rev. 13, 1 (Fall 1971), 55-70.
 
14
Hage, G., and Dewar, R. Elite values versus orgafiizational structure in predicting innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 18, 3 (Sept. 1973), 279-290.
 
15
Hearle, F.R.E. and Mason, R.J. A Data Processing System for State and Local Governments. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963.
16
 
17
Kraemer, K.L., Dutton, W.H., and Matthews, J.R. Municipal computers: growth, usage and management. Urban Data Service Rep. 7, 11 (1976), 1-15.
 
18
Kraemer, K.L. Information in urban systems. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 40, 2 (1974), 3-15.
 
19
Laudon, K.C. Computers and Bureaucratic Reform. Wiley, New York, 1974.
 
20
Leavitt, H.J., and Whisler, T.L. Management in the 1980's. Harvard Business Rev. 26, No. 6 (1958), 41-48.
 
21
Lindblom, C.E. The Policy-Making Process. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1968.
 
22
Lucas, H.C. An empirical study of a framework for information systems. Decision Sci. 5, 1 (Jan. 1974), 102-113.
 
23
Managing Data for Decisions. Spec. Issue Public Management 53, 10 (Oct. 1971), 2-26
 
24
Matthews, J.R., Dutton, W.H., and Kraemer, K.L. County computers: Growth, usage and management. The County Year Book, 1976. Int. City Manag. Assoc., Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 133-149.
 
25
Meyer, M. Automation and bureaucratic structure. Amer. J. Sociology 33 (Dec. 1968), 211-228.
 
26
Nolan, R.L. Computer data bases: The future is now. Harvard Business Rev. 51 (Sept.-Oct. 1973), 98-162.
27
 
28
Orlicky, J. The Successful Computer System. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.
 
29
Ouchi, W.G., and Maguire, M.A. Organizational control: Two functions. Admini. Sci. Quart. 20, 4 (Dec. 1975), 559-569.
 
30
Pack, J.R. The use of urban models: Report on a survey of planning organizations. U. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1973.
 
31
Pendleton, J.C. Integrated information systems. Proc. AFIPS FJCC, Vol. 39, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1971, pp. 491-500.
 
32
Pounds, W.F. The process of problem finding, lndust. Manage. Rev. 11, 1 (Fall 1969), 1-20.
 
33
Powers, R.F. Correlates of MIS project success. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1970.
 
34
Rogers, E.M., and Agarwala-Rogers. Communication in Organizations. The Free Press, New York, 1976.
 
35
San Francisco Department of Planning. Status of the San Francisco Simulation Model. Dept. of City Planning, San Francisco, 1968, pp. 11-27.
 
36
Simon, H.A. The Shape of Automation. Harper and Row, New York, 1965.
 
37
 
38
Starling, J.D. Managing Uncertainty in Urban Politics and Policymaking. U. of California Press, Berkeley. In press.
 
39
Swanson, E.B. On being informed by a computer-based information system. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1972.
 
40
Wildavsky, A. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Little, Brown, Boston, 1964.
 
41
Whisler, T.L. The Impact of the Computer on Organizations, Praeger, New York, 1970.
 
42
Whisler, T.L. The impact of information technology on organizational control. In The Impact of Computers on Management, C.A. Meyers, Ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1967, pp. 16-40.


Collaborative Colleagues:
William H. Dutton: colleagues
Kenneth L. Kraemer: colleagues