An implementation of structured walk-throughs in teaching Cobol programming

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of structured walk-throughs in teaching introductory Cobol programming was empirically assessed with a sample of 215 undergraduate business administration majors. Cobol proficiency was measured by a final examination testing (a) knowledge of language rules, (b) ability to read and debug a program, and (c) the ability to write a program. Analysis of multiple covariance was used to statistically adjust test scores for age and conditional reasoning scores. The findings provide empirical support for incorporating structured walk-throughs into the programming learning process to more effectively develop student proficiency in writing Cobol programs.

REFERENCES

• 1: Baker, F.T. Chief programming team management of production programming. IBM Syst. J. 11 (1972), 56-73.
• 2: Braswell, J. Survey results for the "Questionnaire for the Collegelevel Examination Program (CLEP) Computers and Data Processing Subject Examination," Aug. 1977.
• 3: Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J.C. Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for research on teaching. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, N.L. Gage, Ed., Rand McNally & Co., New York, 1963, pp. 171-245.
• 4: Couger, J.D. Part 1-Triennial survey of computer use/ curriculum. Computing Newsletter for Schools of Business, Colorado Springs, Colo., Oct. 1977, p. 1.
• 5: Elashoff, J.D. Analysis of covariance: A delicate instrument. Amer. Educational Res. J. 6 (1969), 383-401.
• 6: Ennis, R.H., and Paulus, D. Critical thinking readiness in grades 1-12, Phase I: Deductive reasoning in adolescence. Cooperative Res. Proj. No. OE 1680, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., 1965.
• 7: Evans, S.H., and Anastasio, E. Misuse of analysis of covariance when treatment effect and covariate are confounded. Psychological Bull. (April 1968), 225-234.
• 8: Fagan, M.E. Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Syst. J. 15 (1976), 182-211.
• 9: J. K. Hughes , G. C. Michtom , J. I. Michtom, A structured approach to programming, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1987
• 10: Jurs, S.G., and Glass, G.V. The effect of experimental mortality on the internal and external validity of the randomized comparative experiment. J. of Experimental Education 40, 1, p. 63.
• 11: Kelly, F.F., Beggs, D.L., and McNeily, K. Multiple Regression Approach. S. Illinois U. Press, Edwardsville, II1., 1969, p. 249.
• 12: Kirk, R.E. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Belmont, Calif., 1968, p. 453.
• 13: Ronald Steven Lemos, A comparative study of the effectiveness of team interaction in cobol programming language learning., 1977
• 14: Lindquist, E. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1953, p. 193.
• 15: Charles R. Litecky , Gordon B. Davis, A study of errors, error-proneness, and error diagnosis in Cobol, Communications of the ACM, v.19 n.1, p.33-38, Jan. 1976 [doi>10.1145/359970.359991]
• 16: Murach, M. Standard COBOL instructors' manual (2nd ed.). Test D, Topic 3, Sci. Res. Associates, Chicago, Illinois, 1975.
• 17: Murach, M. Standard COBOL. Sci. Res. Associates, Chicago, Illinois, 1971, pp. 58-63.
• 18: Payne, D.A. The Assessment of Learning: Cognitive and Affective. D.C. Heath and Co., Lexington, Mass., 1974, pp. 144-145.
• 19: Philippakis, A.S. A popularity contest for languages. Datamation (Dec. 1977), 81-87.
• 20: Porter, A.C. Analysis strategies for some common evaluation paradigms. Occasional Paper No. 21, Office of Res. Consultation, Michigan State U., East Lansing, Mich., Feb. 1973.
• 21: Shelly, G.B., and Cashman, T.J. Implementation of structured walk-throughs in the classroom. The Compiler (Fall 1977), 11-15.
• 22: Gary B. Shelly , Thomas J. Cashman, Introduction to Computer Programming: ANSI COBOL, Anaheim Publishing Company, 1973
• 23: Taylor, J.K. The effect of instruction in computer programming on the deductive reasoning of junior college business data processing majors. Unpub. doctoral diss., U. of Calif., Los Angeles, 1970.
• 24: Weinberg, G.M. Programming a social as well as an individual activity. Quoted by M. Upton, Computerworld (May 8, 1974), p. 59.
• 25: G. M. Weinberg, The psychology of computer programming, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY, 1988
• 26: Welford, A.T. Ageing and Human Skill. Oxford U. Press, England, 1958.
• 27: Edward Yourdon, Techniques of Program Structure and Design, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1986

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
Cobol programming, structured walk-throughs, teaching of programming, testing programming proficiency