ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How can cooperative work tools support dynamic group process? bridging the specificity frontier
Full text PdfPdf (201 KB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 279 - 288  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-222-0
Author
Sponsors
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 100,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/358916.358999
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the past, most collaboration support systems have focused on either automating fixed work processes or simply supporting communication in ad-hoc processes. This results in systems that are usually inflexible and difficult to change or that provide no specific support to help users decide what to do next.

This paper describes a new kind of tool that bridges the gap between these two approaches by flexibly supporting processes at many points along the spectrum: from highly specified to highly unspecified. The development of this approach was strongly based on social science theory about collaborative work.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R.C.Schank and R.P.Abelson,Scripts,Plans,Goals And Understanding:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.
 
2
T.W nograd and F.Flores,Understanding Computers and Cognition:a New Foundation for Design.Norwood, N.J.:Ablex Pub.Corp.,1986.
 
3
 
4
T.Winograd,"Categories,Disciplines,and Social Coordinat on,"Computer Supported Cooperat ve Work, vol.2,pp.pp.191-197,1994.
 
5
L.Suchman,"Do Categories Have Politics?,"Computer Supported Cooperat ve Work,vol.2,pp.pp.177-190, 1994.
6
 
7
M.D.Zisman,"Off ce Automation:Revolution or Evolution?,"Sloan Management Rev ew,vol.19,pp.1- 16,1978.
 
8
C.Mohan,G.Alonso,R.G~nth~r,and M.Kamath, "Exotica:A Research Perpespective on Workflow management Systems,"IEEE-Data Eng neering,vol.18, pp.pp.19-26,1995.
 
9
S.Jablonsk and C.Bussler,Workflow management: modeling,concepts,architecture and mplementation. London &Boston:International Thomson Computer Press,1996.
10
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
P.G.W.Keen and M.S.Scott Morton,Decis on support systems:an organ zational perspective.Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley Pub.Co.,1978.
 
15
R.Rock,P.Ulrich,and F.H.Witt, D enstle stungsrat onal s erung m Umbruch -Wege n d e Kommun kationswirtschaft,vol.11,1st ed.Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag,1990.
 
16
K.E.Weick,The social psychology of organizing,2nd ed.Reading,Mass.:Addison-Wesley Pub.Co.,1979.
 
17
J.E.Bardram,"Plans as Situated Action:An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems,"presented at F fth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.Kluwer Academic Publishers,1997.
 
18
A.Bernstein and C.P.Schucan,"Document and Process Transformation During the Product L fe-Cycle,"in Information and Process Integration in Enterprises - Rethinking Documents,T.Wakayame,S.Kannapan,C. M.Khoong,S.Navathe,and J.Yates,Eds.Norwell, MA:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1998.
 
19
W.J.Orl kowski,"Improvising Organizat onal Change Over T me:A Situated Change Perspective," Information Systems Research,vol.7,pp.63-92,1996.
 
20
 
21
H.Mintzberg and J.A.Waters,"Of Strateg es, Deliberate and Emergent,"Strategic Management Journal,vol.6,pp.257-272,1985.
 
22
P.F.Berliner,Think ng in Jazz:The Inf nite Art of Improvisation.Chicago,IL:Un versity of Chicago, 1994.
 
23
24
25
 
26
C.A.Ellis and G.J.Nutt,"Workflow:The Process Spectrum,"presented at NSF Workshop on Workflow and Process Automation n Information Systems:Stateof-the-art and Future Directions,University of Georgia, Athens,1996.
 
27
 
28
T.Kreifelts,E.Hinrichs,and G.Woetzel,"Sharing todo lists with a distributed task manager,"presented at Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work,(ECSCW), Milan,Italy,1993.
29
30
 
31
D.S.Weld,"An introduction to least commitment plann ng," AI Magazine,,vol.15,pp.27-61,1994.
 
32
 
33
J.L.Kolodner,R.L.Simpson,and K.Sycara-Cyranski, "A process Model of Case-Based Reasoning in Problem Solving,"presented at International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI),1985.
 
34
A.Bernstein,"The Product Workbench:An Env ronment for the Mass-Customization of Production- Processes,"presented at Workshop on Information Technology and Systems (WITS),Helsinki,Finland, 1998.
 
35
 
36
J.R.Searle,Speech acts:an essay in the philosophy of language.London,:Cambr dge U.P.,1969.
 
37
C.V.Lopes and G.Kiczales,"D:A Language Framework for D str buted Programm ng,"Xerox Palo Alto Research Center,Palo Alo,CA,Techn cal Report SPL97-010,P9710047,February 1997 1997.
 
38
 
39
 
40
 
41
ONEstone,"ProZessware for Lotus Domino/Notes," ONEstone Information Technolog es GmbH,Paderborn, Germany,Wh te Paper 1998 1998.
 
42
R.L.Blumenthal,"Supporting Unstructured Activities with a Meta-Contextual Protocol in Situation-Based Workflow,"in Department of Computer Science. Boulder,CO:Un vers ty of Clorado,1998,pp.173.
43

CITED BY  19