Distance learning through distributed collaborative video viewing

ABSTRACT

Previous research on Tutored Video Instruction (TVI) shows that learning is enhanced when small groups of students watch and discuss lecture videos together. Using specialized, high-end videoconferencing systems, these improved results have been shown to apply even when the students are in different locations (Distributed TVI, or DTVI). In this paper, we explore two issues in making DTVI-like scenarios widely supported at low cost. First, we explore design of a system that allows distributed individuals to collectively watch video using shared VCR controls such as play, pause, seek, stop. We show how such a system can be built on top of existing commercial technologies. Second, we explore the impact of four alternative discussion channels on student learning and interaction behavior. The four channels-text chat, audioconferencing, videoconferencing, and face-to-face-have differing infrastructure requirements and costs. Our lab studies show that while text chat does not work, there is no significant difference in discussion behavior and learning between audioconferencing and videoconferencing. While lab studies have their limitations and long-term field studies need to be done, the preliminary results point to a low-cost way for a DTVI-like model to be deployed widely in the very near future.

REFERENCES

• 1: Boyle, E., Anderson, A., and Newlands, A. (1994). The effects of visibility on dialogue performance in a cooperative problem solving task, Language and Speech, 37, 1, 1-20.
• 2: Chapanis, A. (1975). Interactive human communication. Scientific American, 232, 36-42.
• 3: Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R. B., Parrish, R. N., and Weeks, G. D. (1972). Studies in interactive communication: The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during a co-operative problem solving. Human Factors, 14, 487-509.
• 4: Carmen Egido, Teleconferencing as a technology to support cooperative work: its possibilities and limitations, Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1990
• 5: Abigail J. Sellen , Sylvia B. Wilbur , Kathleen E. Finn, Video-Mediated Communication, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1997
• 6: Gibbons, J. F., Kincheloe, W. R., and Down, K. S. (1977). Tutored videotape instruction: a new use of electronics media in education. Science. 195: 1139- 1146.
• 7: Green and Williges, R. C. (1975). Evaluation of alternative media used with a groupware editor in a simulated telecommunication environment. Human Factors, 37(3), 283-289.
• 8: The Microsoft Windows Media Player, http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia
• 9: Microsoft Windows NetMeeting, http://www.microsoft.com/windows/netmeeting
• 10: The Microsoft Windows NetMeeting 3.0 SDK, http://www.microsoft.com/windows/NetMeeting/ Authors/SDK/default.ASP
• 11: O'Connaill, B., Whittaker, S., and Wilbur, S. (1993). Conversations over videoconferences: An evaluation of video mediated interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 8, 389-428.
• 12: Judith S. Olson , Gary M. Olson , David K. Meader, What mix of video and audio is useful for small groups doing remote real-time design work?, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.362-368, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223904.223951]
• 13: Nosa Omoigui , Liwei He , Anoop Gupta , Jonathan Grudin , Elizabeth Sanocki, Time-compression: systems concerns, usage, and benefits, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.136-143, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.303017]
• 14: The Real Video Player, http://www.real.com
• 15: Sipusic, M., Pannoni, R., Smith, R., Dutra, J., Gibbons., J., and Sutherland, W. (1999). Virtual Collaborative Learning: A Comparison between Face-to-Face Tutored Video Instruction and Distributed Tutored Video Instruction (DTVI). Sun Microsystems Laboratories, Inc. TR-99-72. Available at http://www.sun.com/research/techrep/1999/ abstract-72.html
• 16: Smith, R., Sipusic, M., and Pannoni, R. (1999). Experiments Comparing Face-to-Face with Virtual Collaborative Learning. Sun Microsystems Laboratories, Inc. TR-99-0285.
• 17: Stone, H.R. (1990). Economic development and technology transfer: Implications for video-based distance education. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Contemporary issues in American distance education (pp. 231-242). Oxford, England: Pergamon.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems
          Subjects: Video (e.g., tape, disk, DVI)

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS
      H.4.3 Communications Applications
          Subjects: Computer conferencing, teleconferencing, and videoconferencing
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Collaborative computing

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.1 Computer Uses in Education
          Subjects: Distance learning

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management, Measurement, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
distance learning, distributed tutored video instruction (DTVI), tutored video instruction (TVI), videoconferencing