The impact of office automation on the organization: some implications for research and practice

ABSTRACT

Computer technology has recently been applied to the automation of office tasks and procedures. Much of the technology is aimed not at improving the efficiency of current office procedures, but at altering the nature of office work altogether. The development of automated office systems raises a number of issues for the organization. How will this technology be received by organization members? How will it affect the definition of traditional office work? What will be its impact on individuals, work groups, and the structure of the organization? This paper presents a descriptive model and propositions concerning the potential impacts of office automation on the organization and it stresses the need, when implementing automated office systems, to take a broad perspective of their potential positive and negative effects on the organization. The need for further research examining the potential effects of office automation is emphasized.

REFERENCES

• 1: Allen, Thomas J. and Cohen, Stephen I. Information flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 1, (March 1, 1969) 12-19.
• 2: Allport, G.W. and Postman, L. The Psychology of Rumor. Russell and Russell, New York, 1965.
• 3: Argyris, C. Management information systems: The challenge to rationality and emotionality. Management Science, 17, 8 (Feb. 1971) B275-292.
• 4: Bair, James H. Productivity assessment of office information systems technology. Paper presented at Trends and Applications: 1978, Distributed Processing Conference, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD, 1978.
• 5: Bair, James H. Communications in the office of the future: Where the real payoff may be. Proceedings of the International Computer Communications Conference, Kyoto, Japan, September 1978.
• 6: Canning, Richard G. The automated office: Part I. EDP Analyzer, 16, 9 (Sept. 1978).
• 7: Canning, Richard G. The automated office: Part II. EDP Analyzer, 16, 10 (Oct. 1978).
• 8: Carlisle, James H. Evaluating the impact of office automation and top management communications. AFIPS National Computer Conference Proceedings, Montvale, N.J., 1976, 611-616.
• 9: Carlisle, James H. The management communication and control of office automation. Paper presented at the Infotech State of the Art Conference on Convergence: Computers, Communications, and Office Automation, Paris, France, October 1978.
• 10: Champness, B.G. and Davies, M.F. The Maier pilot experiment. Unpublished Communications Studies Group Paper No. E/71030/ CH, 1971 (discussed in {46}).
• 11: Chapanis, A. Interactive human communication. Scientific American, (March 1975) 36-42.
• 12: Conrath, David W. and Bait, James H. The computer as an interpersonal communications device: A study of augmentation technology and its apparent impact on organizational communication. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Communications, August, 1974.
• 13: Conrath, D.W., Higgins, C.A., Irving, R.H., and Thachenkary, C.S. Determining the need for office automation: Methods and results. Journal of Office Information Systems (to appear).
• 14: Cooper, Cary L. and Marshall, J. Sources of managerial and white collar stress. In C.L. Cooper and R. Payne (Eds.), Stress at Work. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978, Chapter 3.
• 15: Downing, H. Word processors and the oppression of women. In T. Forester (Ed.), The Microelectronics Revolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1981, 275-287.
• 16: Edwards, Gwen C. An analysis of usage and related perceptions of NLS-A computer based text processing and communications systems. Unpublished report, Bell Canada, October 1977.
• 17: Clarence A. Ellis , Gary J. Nutt, Office Information Systems and Computer Science, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.12 n.1, p.27-60, March 1980 [doi>10.1145/356802.356805]
• 18: Engel, G.H., Groppuso, J. Lowenstein, R.A. and Traub, W.G. An office communications system. IBM Systems Journal, 18, 3 (1979), 402-431.
• 19: Ernst, Martin L. Productivity in new forms. Special Advertising section. Time Magazine, (Nov. 1979).
• 20: Firnberg, D. Statement of concern. Office: Technology and People, 1, 1 (March 1982), 20-23.
• 21: French, J.R.P. and Raven, B.H. The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1959.
• 22: Jay R. Galbraith, Designing Complex Organizations, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1973
• 23: Hackman, J. Richard and Oldham, Greg R. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Technical Report 6, Dept. of Administrative Sciences, Yale University, December 1974.
• 24: Hage, Jerald, Aiken, Michael and Marrett, Cora. Organization structure and communications. American Sociological Review. 36, 5 (Oct. 1971) 860-871.
• 25: Herzberg, F., Work and the Nature of Man. World Publishing, Cleveland, 1966.
• 26: Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R., Lee, C.A., Schneck, R.E., and Pennings, J.M. A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 2 (June 1971) 216-229.
• 27: Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. The Network Nation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1979.
• 28: Johansen, R. and DeGrasse, R. Computer-based teleconferencing: Effects on working patterns. Journal of Communications. 29, 3, (Summer 1979), 30-41.
• 29: Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Snock, J.E., and Rosenthal, R.A. Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. Wiley, New York, 1964.
• 30: Keen, Peter G.W. Editor's preface. Office: Technology and People. 1, 1 (March 1982), 1-11.
• 31: Kelley, H.H. Communication of experimentally created hierarchies. Human Relations. 4, 1, (1951) 39-56.
• 32: Kling, R. and Scacchi, W. The social dynamics of computing in complex organizations. Advances in Computers 19, (1980), 250-327.
• 33: Leduc, Nicole F. Communications through computers: Impact on a small business group. Telecommunications Policy, 3, 3 (Sept. 1979) 235-244.
• 34: Henry C. Lucas, Toward Creative Systems Design, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1974
• 35: Henry C. Lucas, Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1981
• 36: Maslow, Abraham H. Motivation and Personality. Harper and Row, New York, 1954.
• 37: McGrath, Joseph E. Stress and behavior in organizations. In Marvin D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Rand-McNally, Chicago, 1976, Chapter 35.
• 38: McGregor, D., The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.
• 39: Meyer, N. D. Office automation: A progress report. Office: Technology and People. 1, 1 (March 1982) 107-121.
• 40: Mintzberg, H., The Nature of Managerial Work. Harper and Row, New York, 1973.
• 41: Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. and Steers, R.M. Employee- Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. Academic Press, New York, 1982, Chapter 2.
• 42: Ness, D., Office automation project: Managerial overview. Department of Decision Sciences Working Paper No. 76-07-04, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, July 1976.
• 43: Olson, Margrethe H. Remote office work: Implications for individuals and organizations. Center for Research on Information Systems, New York University, September, 1981.
• 44: Olson, Margrethe H. and White, Norman H. The impact of office automation on society: Implications for education policy, and research. Automated Office Conference Digest. (March 1980) 189-199.
• 45: Read, W. Upward communication in industrial hierarchies. Human Relations. 15, 1 (1962) 3-16.
• 46: Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley and Sons, London, 1976.
• 47: Smith, P.C., Kendall, L.M., and Hurlin, C.L. The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement: A Strategy for the Study of Attitudes. Rand-McNaily, Chicago, 1969.
• 48: Stewart, J. The inhuman office of the future. Saturday Review '6, 13 (June 23, 1979) 14--17.
• 49: Strassman, P.A. Overview of strategic aspects of information management. Office: Technology and People. 1, 1 (March 1982) 71-89.
• 50: Turner, Jon T. and Karasek, Robert A. Jr. Software ergonomics: Effects of computer applications design parameters on operator task performance and health. Ergonomics, (to appear).
• 51: Uhlig, R.P., Farber, D.J. and Bair, J.H. The Office of the Future: Communication and Computers. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979 Chapter 1.
• 52: Walton, Richard E. and Dutton, John M. The management of interdepartmental conflict: An overview. Administrative Science Quarterly. 14, 1 (March 1969) 73-84.
• 53: White, Robert B. Jr. A prototype for the automated office. Datamation, (April 1977), 83-90.
• 54: Working Women. Race Against Time: Automation of the Office. National Association of Office Workers, Cleveland, Ohio, April, 1980.
• 55: Working Women. Warning: Health Hazards for Office Workers. National Association of Office Workers, Cleveland, Ohio, April, 1980.
• 56: The Yankee Group. Report on Electronic Mail. November, 1979.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  J. Computer Applications
  J.1 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING
      Subjects: Business

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors, Management, Theory

Keywords:
automated office systems, electronic mail, impact on organizations, office automation