Building a user-derived interface

ABSTRACT

Many human-computer interfaces are designed with the assumption that the user must adapt to the system, that users must be trained and their behavior altered to fit a given interface. The research presented here proceeds from the alternative assumption: Novice behavior is inherently sensible, and the computer system can be made to adapt to it. Specifically, a measurably easy-to-use interface was built to accommodate the actual behavior of novice users. Novices attempted an electronic mail task using a command-line interface containing no help, no menus, no documentation, and no instruction. A hidden operator intercepted commands when necessary, creating the illusion of an interactive session. The software was repeatedly revised to recognize users' new commands; in essence, the interface was derived from user behavior. This procedure was used on 67 subjects. The first version of the software could recognize only 7 percent of all the subjects' spontaneously generated commands; the final version could recognize 76 percent of these commands. This experience contradicts the idea that user input is irrelevant to the design of command languages. Through careful observation and analysis of user behavior, a mail interface unusable by novices evolved into one that let novices do useful work within minutes.

REFERENCES

• 1: Alfred V. Aho , Jeffrey D. Ullman, Principles of Compiler Design (Addison-Wesley series in computer science and information processing), Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1977
• 2: John B. Black , Thomas P. Moran, Learning and remembering command names, Proceedings of the 1982 conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.8-11, March 15-17, 1982, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/800049.801745]
• 3: Bruder, J., Moy, M.. Mueller, A., and Danielson, R. User experience and evolving design in a local electronic mail system. In Computer Message Systems, R.P. Uhlig, Ed. North-Holland, New York, 1981, pp. 69-78.
• 4: Chapanis, A. Man-computer research at Johns Hopkins. In Information Technology and Psychology: Prospects for the Future, R.A. Kasschau, R. Lachman. and K.R. Laughery, Eds. Praeger Publishers, New York, 1982, pp. 238-249.
• 5: Ford. W.R. Natural-language processing by computer--A new approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Psychology Dept., The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md., 1981 (University Microfilms Order 8115709).
• 6: Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Gomez, L.M., and Dumais, S.T. Statistical semantics: Analysis of the potential performance of key-word systems. Bell System Technical Journal 62, 6 (July-Aug. 1983), 1753- 1806.
• 7: M. Good, AN EASE OF USE EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED EDITOR AND, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1981
• 8: Goodwin. N.C. Effect of interface design on usability of message handling systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 26th Aimual Meeting (Seattle, Wash, Oct. 25-29). Human Factors Society, Santa Monica. Calif.. 1982, pp. 505-508.
• 9: John D. Gould , John Conti , Todd Hovanyecz, Composing letters with a simulated listening typewriter, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.4, p.295-308, April 1983 [doi>10.1145/2163.358100]
• 10: John D. Gould , Clayton Lewis, Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p.50-53, December 12-15, 1983, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/800045.801579]
• 11: Hammer, J.M., and Rouse, W.B. The human as a constrained optimal editor. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-12, 6 (Nov./Dec. 1982), 777-784.
• 12: J. F. Kelley, An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.2 n.1, p.26-41, Jan. 1984 [doi>10.1145/357417.357420]
• 13: B. W. Kernighan , D. M. Ritchie, The C programming language, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1978
• 14: Henry F. Ledgard, A human engineered variant of BNF, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.15 n.10, p.57-62, October 1980 [doi>10.1145/947727.947732]
• 15: Mack, R.L. Understanding text editing: Evidence from predictions and descriptions given by computer-naive people, Res. Rep. RC 10333, IBM Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y., Jan. 18, 1984.
• 16: Thomas W. Malone, How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.1 n.1, p.99-112, Jan. 1983 [doi>10.1145/357423.357430]
• 17: Miller. D.C.. and Pew. R.W. Exploiting user involvement in interactive system development. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (Rochester, N.Y., Oct. 12-16). Human Factors Society, Santa Monic8, Calif., 1981, pp. 401-405.
• 18: Morgan, C.. Williams, G., and Lemmons, P. An interview with Wayne Rosing, Bruce Daniels, and Larry Tesler. Byte 8, 2 (Feb. 1983), 90-114.
• 19: Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., and Tannenbaum, P.H. The Measurement of Meaning. Univ. of Illilaois Press. Urbana, Ill., 1957.
• 20: Teresa L. Roberts , Thomas P. Moran, The evaluation of text editors: methodology and empirical results., Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.4, p.265-283, April 1983 [doi>10.1145/2163.2164]
• 21: Tesler, L. Enlisting user help in software design. SIGCHI Bull., 14, 1 (Jan. 1983}, 5-9.
• 22: Wagreich. B.J. Electronic mail for the hearing impaired and its potential for other disabilities. IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-30, 1 (Jan. 1982), 58-65.
• 23: Whiteside. J., and Wixon, D. Developmental theory as a framework for studying human-computer interaction. In Advances in Human- Computer Interaction, H.R. Hartson, Ed. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, N.J. To be published.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: User interfaces

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
command-language design, human-computer interaction, iterative design, user-derived interface