ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Anomalies in parallel branch-and-bound algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (606 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 27 ,  Issue 6  (June 1984) table of contents
Pages: 594 - 602  
Year of Publication: 1984
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Ten-Hwang Lai  Ohio State Univ., Columbus
Sartaj Sahni  Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 47,   Citation Count: 35
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/358080.358103
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider the effects of parallelizing branch-and-bound algorithms by expanding several live nodes simultaneously. It is shown that it is quite possible for a parallel branch-and-bound algorithm using n2 processors to take more time than one using n1 processors, even though n1 < n2. Furthermore, it is also possible to achieve speed-ups that are in excess of the ratio n2/n1. Experimental results with the 0/1-Knapsack and Traveling Salesman problems are also presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agin, N. Optimum seeking with branch-and-bound. Manage. Sci. 13, pp. B176-B185.
 
2
Desai, B. The BPU, a staged parallel processing system to solve the zero-one problem. Proc. ICS '78, 1978, pp. 802-817.
 
3
Desai, B. A parallel microprocessing system. Proc. 1979 Int. Conf. Parallel Processing, 1979.
 
4
Desai, B. A parallel processing system to solve the 0-1 programming problem. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Jan. 1977.
 
5
E1-Dessouki, O. and Huen, W. Distributed enumeration on network computers IEEE Trans. Computers C-29, 1980, pp. 818-825.
 
6
Fox, B., Lenstra, J., Rinnooy Kan, A. and Schrage, L. Branching from the largest upper bound: Folklore and fact. Europ. J. Op. Res. 2, 1978, pp. 191-194.
 
7
Graham, R. Bounds on multiprocessor timing anomalies. SIAM J. Applied Math. 17, 2, 1969, pp. 416-429.
8
 
9
Held, M. and Karp, R. The traveling salesman problem and minimum spanning trees: Part II, Math. Prog. 1, 1971, pp. 6-25.
 
10
Horowitz. E. and Sahni. S. Fundamentals of Computer Algorithms. Computer Science Press, Inc., Bethesda, MD. 1978.
 
11
Ignall, E. and Schrage, L. Application of the branch-and-bound technique to some flow-shop scheduling problems. Oper. Res. 13, 1965, pp. 400-412.
 
12
Kohler, W. and Steiglitz, K. Enumerative and iterative computational approaches. In E. Coffman (ed.) Computer and Job-Shop Scheduling Theory, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1976, pp. 229- 287.
 
13
Lawler, E. and Wood, D. Branch-and-bound methods: A survey. Oper. Res. 14, 1966, pp. 699-719.
 
14
Mitten, L. Branch-and-bound methods: General formulation and properties. Oper. Res. 18, 1970, pp. 24-34.
 
15
 
16

CITED BY  35

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ten-Hwang Lai: colleagues
Sartaj Sahni: colleagues