ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Gauging the risks of internet elections
Full text HtmlHtml (36 KB),  PdfPdf (159 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 44 ,  Issue 1  (January 2001) table of contents
Pages: 73 - ff.  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Deborah M. Phillips  Voting Integrity Project, Arlington, VA
Hans A. von Spakovsky  Georgia Public Policy Foundation, Atlanta, GA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 110,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/357489.357512
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bradley, P. Inequality seen in voting via the Internet. Richmond Times- Dispatch (Apr. 2, 2000), C1.
 
2
California Internet Voting Task Force (California Secretary of State). A Report on the Feasibility of Internet Voting (Jan. 2000); see www.ss.ca.gov.
 
3
Committee for the Study of the American Electorate, Washington, D.C., report released Feb. 8, 1999.
 
4
Fairley Raney, R. Voting by the Internet: The mouse still hasn't roared. New York Times (Jan. 30, 2000), B10.
 
5
Ledbetter, J. Net out the vote. Industry Standard (Mar. 20, 2000); see www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,13004,00.html.
 
6
Ledbetter, J. Virtual voting faces real-world concerns (Mar. 16, 2000); see slate.msn.com/netelection/entries/00-03-16_77458.asp.
 
7
McKenna, B. Web sites said powerless to foil hacker attacks. Globe and Mail (Apr. 7, 2000), B6.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Deborah M. Phillips: colleagues
Hans A. von Spakovsky: colleagues