ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the Web's most popular sites
Full text PdfPdf (538 KB)
Source ACM Conference on Universal Usability archive
Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability table of contents
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Pages: 139 - 144  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-314-6
Authors
Terry Sullivan  Univ. of North Texas, Denton
Rebecca Matson  Univ. of North Texas, Denton
Sponsors
USACM : United States Association for Computational Mechanics
AFIHM : Ass. Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
British HCI Group :
American Library Association : American Library Association Office of Info. Systems Policy
SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
SIGCAS: ACM Special Interest Group on Computers and Society
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 177,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/355460.355549
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Content accessibility is a key feature in highly usable Web sites, but reports in the popular press typically report that 95% or more of all Web sites are inaccessible to users with disabilities. The present study is a content accessibility compliance audit of 50 of the Web's most popular sites, undertaken to determine if content accessibility can be conceived and reported in continuous, rather than dichotomous, terms. Preliminary results suggest that a meaningful ordinal ranking of content accessibility is not only possible, but also correlates significantly with the results of independent automated usability assessment procedures.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Cited on http://www.w3.org/WAI/Overview.html
 
3
Cited on http://www.w3.org:80/Press/WAI-Launch
 
4
Bohman, Paul (2000) The Applicability of the A.D.A. to the Internet. CPD News. Available online: http :/ /www. webairn, org/articles/ada
 
5
Brajnik, G. (2000) Automatic Web Usability Evaluation: Where is the Limit? Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human Factors and the Web
 
6
 
7
Engelman, L. (1995) The Great Equalizer. Available online:http://www.internetworld, com/prinffmonthly/19 95/07/foundit.htm {1999, April 7}.
 
8
 
9
Web blind spots By Lisa Vaas, PC Week Online April 10, 2000 available: http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,250 5714,00.html}
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16

CITED BY  19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Terry Sullivan: colleagues
Rebecca Matson: colleagues