ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Usability testing with screen reading technology in a Windows environment
Full text PdfPdf (912 KB)
Source ACM Conference on Universal Usability archive
Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability table of contents
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Pages: 102 - 109  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-314-6
Author
Kitch Barnicle  Univ of Wisconsin, Madison
Sponsors
USACM : United States Association for Computational Mechanics
AFIHM : Ass. Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
British HCI Group :
American Library Association : American Library Association Office of Info. Systems Policy
SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
SIGCAS: ACM Special Interest Group on Computers and Society
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 99,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/355460.355543
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Ever since applications with graphical user interfaces were introduced, individuals who are blind have experienced great difficulty accessing these applications. The quality of access provided through a combination of screen reading software and speech synthesizer is greatly dependent on the design of the mainstream application interface. In attempt to better understand the access strategies employed by users of screen readers, this study was designed to (a) examine the interaction between users of screen reading technology and graphical user interface (GUI) elements and (b) to identify the type and significance of obstacles encountered during these interactions. Fifty-eight unique obstacles encountered by participants were identified. These obstacles were encountered by the thirteen participants a total 534 times. Although many obstacles lead to minor delays, the cumulative effect of these obstacles was to significantly delay, and in many cases, prevent task completion.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Earl, C., & Leventhal, J. A survey of Windows screen reader users: Recent improvements in accessibility. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness (JVIB), 93, 3 (1999), 174-177.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Lewis, C. Using the "thinking-aloud" method in cognitive interface design (RC 9265 (#40713)). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center. 1982.
 
6
 
7
Leventhal, J., & Earl, C. Accessing Microsoft Windows with synthetic speech: A user survey. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness (JVIB) News Service, 91,1 (1997), 12-16.
 
8
Marcus, A. Graphical user interfaces. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of humancomputer interaction (2nd ed.), completely revised. Amsterdam: Elsevier,(1997), 423-440.
 
9
McKinley, J., & Sacco, T. Access to graphical user interface by blind and visually impaired computer users: A nationwide survey. Palo Alto, CA: Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 1995.
 
10
Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Office 2000 Accessibility. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation, 1998.
 
11
Morkes, J., & Nielsen, J. Concise, SCANNABLE, and objective: How to write for the web: useit.com. Available at http://www.useit.com/papers/ webwriting/writing.html.
 
12
 
13
 
14
Paap, K. R. and Cook, N.J. Design of Menus. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed), completely revised. Amsterdam: Elsevier, (1997), 423-440.
 
15
 
16
Scadden, L. A. (1984). Blindness in the information age: Equality or irony? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 78,9 (1984), 394-400.
 
17
 
18
Tyler, K. Software certifications boost productivity. HR Magazine: Society for Human Resource Management (1997, May).