ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Accessible accessibility
Full text PdfPdf (595 KB)
Source ACM Conference on Universal Usability archive
Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability table of contents
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Pages: 96 - 101  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-314-6
Authors
David Sloan  Univ. of Dundee, Scotland
Peter Gregor  Univ. of Dundee, Scotland
Murray Rowan  Univ. of Dundee, Scotland
Paul Booth  Univ. of Dundee, Scotland
Sponsors
USACM : United States Association for Computational Mechanics
AFIHM : Ass. Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
British HCI Group :
American Library Association : American Library Association Office of Info. Systems Policy
SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
SIGCAS: ACM Special Interest Group on Computers and Society
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/355460.355480
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the need for an all-encompassing methodology for determining the level of accessibility of web resources, and the requirement that the results of such a procedure are as meaningful as possible to developers. It is argued that current accessibility evaluation methods are unsatisfactory in the scope and presentation of their results. An alternative meta-method of accessibility assessment is then described.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Bobby is available from the Centre for Applied Special Technology (CAST) web site: http://www.cast.org/bobbv
 
3
Colwell, C. and Petrie, H. (1999) Evaluation of Guidelines for Designing Accessible Web content, in: Biihler, C. & Knops, H. (Eds) Assistive Technology on the Threshold of the New Millennium (IOS press).
 
4
Department of Applied Computing, University of Dundee: http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk
 
5
Digital Media Access Group: http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/proj ects/dmag/
 
6
Disability and Information Systems in Higher Education (DISinHE): http://www.disinhe.ac.uk
 
7
Instone, K., (1997) Usability Heuristics for the Web. http://webreview.com/97/10/10/usability/sidebar.html
 
8
JAWS for Windows, by Henter-Joyce: http://www.hj.com
 
9
Newell, A.F. and Gregor, P. (1997) Human Computer Interfaces for People with Disabilities, in: Helander, M.G., Landauer, T. K., and Prabhu, P.V. (Eds) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (Amsterdam, Elsevier)
 
10
Nielsen, J. (2000) Designing Web Usability (New Riders)
 
11
Nielsen, J. (2000) Alerthox: Why you only need to Test with 5 Users http://www.useit.com/alerthox/20000319.html
 
12
 
13
Nielsen, J. (1999) Alertbox: Disabled Accessibility - The Pragrnatic Approach http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990613.html
 
14
Petrie, H, Colwell, C, Engelen, J and Evenepoel, F (1999) in Assistive Technology on the Threshold of the New Millenium. Access to the World Wide Web for disabled persons. IOS Press.
 
15
W3C Summary of Policies Relating to Web Accessibility: http://www.w3.org/WAI/References/Policg
 
16
pwWebSpeak, by isSound Corporation (formerly Productivity Works): http://www.prodworks.com
 
17
Size-o-Marie, by Pythonsoft: http://www.pythoness.eom/SizeOMatic/index.asp
 
18
Web Accessibility Initiative Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 5 th May 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT- 19990505/
 
19
Appendix A, Web Accessibility Initiative Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
David Sloan: colleagues
Peter Gregor: colleagues
Murray Rowan: colleagues
Paul Booth: colleagues