ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Fundamental principles and priority setting for universal usability
Full text PdfPdf (804 KB)
Source ACM Conference on Universal Usability archive
Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability table of contents
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Pages: 32 - 37  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-314-6
Author
Gregg Vanderheiden  Trace Research and Development Center, Madison, WI
Sponsors
USACM : United States Association for Computational Mechanics
AFIHM : Ass. Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
British HCI Group :
American Library Association : American Library Association Office of Info. Systems Policy
SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
SIGCAS: ACM Special Interest Group on Computers and Society
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 134,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/355460.355469
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There are a number of interrelating factors that must be considered and weighed against each other when deciding which features or capabilities should be added to a product to increase its flexibility and usability by a wider range of users. Not all strategies or approaches are created equal, and designers have limited resources in developing and improving products. It is, therefore, important that the different dimensions of usability be understood and that priorities be applied appropriately. This paper attempts to delineate some of the key dimensions of usability and to begin the process of providing a rationale for prioritization between possible changes to a product's interface. The paper discusses a multidimensional prioritization approach that is coupled to a vector-based usability evaluation procedure currently being developed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bureau of the Census, Series P-70, #8. Survey: SIPP, 1984.
 
2
LaPlante, M.P. Data on disability from the National Health Interview Survey, 1983-85: An InfoUse Report. Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Department of Education, 1988.

CITED BY  10