ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Modeling part-whole relationships for spatial data
Full text PdfPdf (911 KB)
Source Geographic Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 1 - 8  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-319-7
Authors
Rosanne Price  School of CSSE, Monash University, 900 Dandenong Road, Daulfield East, Vic. 3145 Australia
Nectaria Tryfona  Computer Sci. Dept., Aalborg Univ., Fredrik Bajersvej 7 , Aalborgøst, Denmark
Christian S. Jensen  Computer Sci. Dept., Aalborg Univ., Fredrik Bajersvej 7 , Aalborgøst, Denmark
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/355274.355275
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Spatial applications must manage partwhole (PW) relationships between spatial objects, for example, the division of an administrative region into zones based on land use. Support for conceptual modeling of relationships between parts and whole, such as aggregation and membership, has been well researched in the object oriented (OO) community; however, spatial data has generally not been considered. We propose here a practical approach to integrating support for spatial PW relationships into conceptual modeling languages. Three different types of relationships—spatial part, spatial membership, and spatial inclusion—that are of general utility in spatial applications are identified and formally defined using a consistent classification framework based on spatial derivation and constraint relationships. An extension of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) for spatiotemporal data, namely Extended Spatiotemporal UML, is used to demonstrate the feasibility of using such an approach to define modeling constructs supporting spatial PW relationships.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[1] Henderson Sellers, B. and F. Barbier, "What Is This Thing Called Aggregation", Proc. TOOLS Europe, 216-230(1999).
 
2
 
3
 
4
[4] J. J. Odell, "Six Different Kinds of Composition", Journal of Object Oriented Programming, 6(8), 10-15 (1994).
 
5
[5] OMG Unified Modeling Language Specifications, version 1.3, Needham, MA: OMG http://www.ftp.omg.org/pub/ docs/ad/990608.pdf(June, 1999).
6
 
7
[7] Price, R., N. Tryfona, and C. S. Jensen, "Extended Spatiotemporal UML: motivations, requirements, and constructs", Journal of Database Management, to be published in Oct/Dec 2000 issue.
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
[12] Winston, M. E., R. Chaffin, and D. Herrmann, "A Taxonomy of Part Whole Relations', Cognitive Science, 11, 417-444 (1987).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Rosanne Price: colleagues
Nectaria Tryfona: colleagues
Christian S. Jensen: colleagues