ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating variable resolution displays with visual search: task performance and eye movements
Full text PdfPdf (635 KB)
Source Eye Tracking Research & Application archive
Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications table of contents
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States
Pages: 105 - 109  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-280-8
Authors
Derrick Parkhurst  The Department of Psychology and The Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
Eugenio Culurciello  The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and The Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
Ernst Niebur  The Department of Neuroscience and The Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/355017.355033
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Gaze-contingent variable resolution display techniques allocate computational resources for image generation preferentially to the area around the center of gaze where visual sensitivity to detail is the greatest. Although these techniques are computationally efficient, their behavioral consequences with realistic tasks and materials are not well understood. The behavior of human observers performing visual search of natural scenes using gaze-contingent variable resolution displays is examined. A two-region display was used where a high-resolution region was centered on the instantaneous center of gaze, and the surrounding region was presented in a lower resolution. The radius of the central high-resolution region was varied from 1 to 15 degrees while the total amount of computational resources required to generate the visual display was kept constant. Measures of reaction time, accuracy, and fixation duration suggest that task performance is comparable to that seen for uniform resolution displays when the central region size is approximately 5 degrees.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Danforth, A. T. Duchowski, R. Geist, and E. McAliley. A platform fore gaze-contingent virtual environments. In A. Butz, A. Kruger, and P. Olivier, editors, Smart Graphics Symposium, pages 66-70. AIII, Menlo Park, CA, 2000.
 
2
A. T. Duchowski. Acuity-matching resolution degredation through wavelet coefficient scaling. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 9(7):1437-1440, 2000.
 
3
D. M. Green and J. A. Swets. Sigm~l Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York, N.Y., 1966.
 
4
A.V. Reed. Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory. Science, pages 574-576, 1973.
 
5
D.M. Stampe. Heuristic filtering and reliable calibration methods for video-based pupil-tracking systems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(2):137-142, 1993.
 
6
V. Virsu and J. Rovamo. Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37(3):475--494, 1979.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Derrick Parkhurst: colleagues
Eugenio Culurciello: colleagues
Ernst Niebur: colleagues