Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

Access control models have traditionally included mandatory access control (or lattice-based access control) and discretionary access control. Subsequently, role-based access control has been introduced, along with claims that its mechanisms are general enough to simulate the traditional methods. In this paper we provide systematic constructions for various common forms of both of the traditional access control paradigms using the role-based access control (RBAC) models of Sandhu et al., commonly called RBAC96. We see that all of the features of the RBAC96 model are required, and that although for the manatory access control simulation, only one administrative role needs to be assumed, for the discretionary access control simulations, a complex set of administrative roles is required.

REFERENCES

• 1: BELL, D. 1987. Secure computer systems: A network interpretation. In Proceedings on 3rd Annual Computer Security Application Conference. 32-39.
• 2: CLARK,D.AND WILSON, D. 1987. A comparison of commercial and military computer security policies. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Oakland, CA, May). 184-194.
• 3: Dorothy E. Denning, A lattice model of secure information flow, Communications of the ACM, v.19 n.5, p.236-243, May 1976 [doi>10.1145/360051.360056]
• 4: GRAHAM,G.AND DENNING, P. 1972. Protection-principles and practice. In Proceedings on AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference. AFIPS Press, Arlington, VA, 417-429.
• 5: LAMPSON, B. 1974. Protection. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Information Sciences and Systems (Princeton, NJ, Mar.). 437-443.
• 6: LEE, T. 1988. Using mandatory integrity to enforce "commercial" security. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Oakland, CA). 140-146.
• 7: Qamar Munawer , Ravi S. Sandhu, Administrative models for role-based access control, 2000
• 8: Matunda Nyanchama , Sylvia L. Osborn, Access Rights Administration in Role-Based Security Systems, Proceedings of the IFIP WG11.3 Working Conference on Database Security VII, p.37-56, August 23-26, 1994
• 9: Matunda Nyanchama , Sylvia Osborn, Modeling mandatory access control in role-based security systems, Proceedings of the ninth annual IFIP TC11 WG11.3 working conference on Database security IX : status and prospects: status and prospects, p.129-144, January 1996, Rennselaerville, New York, United States
• 10: Matunda Nyanchama , Sylvia Osborn, The role graph model and conflict of interest, ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), v.2 n.1, p.3-33, Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1145/300830.300832]
• 11: Sylvia Osborn, Mandatory access control and role-based access control revisited, Proceedings of the second ACM workshop on Role-based access control, p.31-40, November 06-07, 1997, Fairfax, Virginia, United States [doi>10.1145/266741.266751]
• 12: Sylvia L. Osborn , Laura K. Reid , Gregory J. Wesson, On the interaction between role-based access control and relational databases, Proceedings of the tenth annual IFIP TC11/WG11.3 international conference on Database security: volume X : status and prospects: status and prospects, p.275-287, January 1997, Como, Italy
• 13: Ravi S. Sandhu, Lattice-Based Access Control Models, Computer, v.26 n.11, p.9-19, November 1993 [doi>10.1109/2.241422]
• 14: Ravi S. Sandhu, Role Hierarchies and Constraints for Lattice-Based Access Controls, Proceedings of the 4th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security: Computer Security, p.65-79, September 25-27, 1996
• 15: Ravi Sandhu , Venkata Bhamidipati , Qamar Munawer, The ARBAC97 model for role-based administration of roles, ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), v.2 n.1, p.105-135, Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1145/300830.300839]
• 16: Ravi S. Sandhu , Edward J. Coyne , Hal L. Feinstein , Charles E. Youman, Role-Based Access Control Models, Computer, v.29 n.2, p.38-47, February 1996 [doi>10.1109/2.485845]
• 17: Ravi Sandhu , Qamar Munawer, How to do discretionary access control using roles, Proceedings of the third ACM workshop on Role-based access control, p.47-54, October 22-23, 1998, Fairfax, Virginia, United States [doi>10.1145/286884.286893]
• 18: SANDHU,R.AND SAMARATI, P. 1994. Access control: Principles and practice. IEEE Commun. Mag. 32,9,40-48.
• 19: SANDHU,R.S.AND SAMARATI, P. 1997. Authentication, access control and intrusion detection. In The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook, A. B. Tucker, Ed. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1929-1948.
• 20: SCHOCKLEY, W. 1988. Implementing the Clark/Wilson integrity policy using current technology. In Proceedings of the 11th National Computer Security Conference (NIST-NCSC, Baltimore, Maryland, Oct.17-20). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 29-37.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.4 OPERATING SYSTEMS
      D.4.6 Security and Protection
          Subjects: Access controls

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS

General Terms:
Management, Security

Keywords:
discretionary access control, lattice-based access control, mandatory access control, role-based access control