ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Systems, interactions, and macrotheory
Full text PdfPdf (1.60 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) archive
Volume 7 ,  Issue 2  (June 2000) table of contents
Special issue on human-computer interaction in the new millennium, Part 2
Pages: 222 - 262  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISSN:1073-0516
Authors
Philip Barnard  British Medical Research Council, Cambridge, UK
Jon May  Univ. of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
David Duke  Univ. of Bath, Bath, UK
David Duce  Oxford Brookes Univ., Oxford, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 199,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/353485.353490
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A significant proportion of early HCI research was guided by one very clear vision: that the existing theory base in psychology and cognitive science could be developed to yield engineering tools for use in the interdisciplinary context of HCI design. While interface technologies and heuristic methods for behavioral evaluation have rapidly advanced in both capability and breadth of application, progress toward deeper theory has been modest, and some now believe it to be unnecessary. A case is presented for developing new forms of theory, based around generic “systems of interactors.” An overlapping, layered structure of macro- and microtheories could then serve an explanatory role, and could also bind together contributions from the different disciplines. Novel routes to formalizing and applying such theories provide a host of interesting and tractable problems for future basic research in HCI.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ANDERSON, J. R. 1993. Rules of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
 
2
BARNARD, P.J. 1985. Interacting cognitive subsystems: A psycholinguistic approach to short term memory. In Progress in the psychology of language, A. Ellis, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 197-258.
 
3
 
4
 
5
BARNARD, P. 1999. Interacting Cognitive Subsystems: Modeling working memory phenomena within a multi-processor architecture. In Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control, A. Miyake and P. Shah, Eds. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 298-339.
 
6
 
7
BARNARD, P. J. AND HARRISON, M. D. 1992. Towards a framework for modeling humancomputer interactions. In Proceedings on East-West International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (EWCHI'92, Moscow), J. Gornostaev, Ed. 189-196.
 
8
BARNARD, P. AND MARCEL, A. J. 1984. Representation and understanding in the use of symbols and pictograms. In Information Design: The Design and Evaluation of Signs and Printed Material, R. Easterby and H. Zwaga, Eds. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, 37-75.
 
9
BARNARD, P. AND MAY, J. 1993. Cognitive modeling for user requirements. In Computers, Communication and Usability: Design Issues, Research and Methods for Integrated Services, P. F. Byerley, P. J. Barnard, and J. May, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Nethlands, 101-145.
 
10
BARNARD, P. AND MAY, J. 1995. Interactions with advanced graphical interfaces and the deployment of latent human knowledge. In Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems, F. Patern , Ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 15-49.
 
11
BARNARD, P. AND MAY, J. 1999. Representing cognitive activity in complex tasks. Hum. Comput. Interact. 14, 1-2, 93-158.
 
12
BARNARD, P. J., BERNSEN, N. O., COUTAZ, J., DARZENTAS, J., FACONTI, G., HAMMOND, N., HARRISON, M. D., JORGENSEN, A. H., LOWGREN, J., MAY, J., AND YOUNG, R. M. 1995. Assaying Means of Design Expression for Users and Systems: AMODEUS-2 Project Final report, available at http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/amodeus/abstracts/d/d13.html
 
13
BARNARD, P., GRUDIN, J., AND MACLEAN, A. 1989. Developing a science base for the naming of computer commands. In Cognitive Ergonomics and Human Computer Interaction, J. B. Long and A. Whitefield, Eds. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 95-133.
 
14
BARNARD, P. J., MACLEAN, A., AND HAMMOND, N.V. 1984. User representations of ordered sequences of command operations. In Proceedings on Interact'84: First IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (London), 434-438.
15
 
16
BELLOTTI, V., BLANDFORD, A., DUKE, D., MACLEAN, A., MAY, J., AND NIGAY, L. 1996. Interpersonal access control in computer-mediated communications: A systematic analysis of the design space. Hum. Comput. Interact. 11, 4, 357-432.
 
17
 
18
 
19
BORDEGONI, M. AND HEMMJE, M. 1993. A dynamic gesture language and graphical feedback for interaction in a 3d user interface. Comput. Graph. Forum 12, 1, 1-11.
 
20
BOWMAN, H. AND FACONTI, G. 1999. Analysing cognitive behaviour using LOTOS and Mexitl. Form. Asp. Comput. 11.
 
21
 
22
CARROLL, J. M. AND CARRITHERS, C. 1984. Blocking learner errors in a training wheels system. Hum. Factors 26, 377-389.
23
 
24
CHAPANIS, A. 1975. Interactive human communication. Sci. Am. 232, 3 (Mar.), 36-42.
 
25
 
26
CLARK, H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
 
27
 
28
DIX, A. 1991. Formal Methods for Interactive Systems. Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY.
 
29
DUKE, D. 1995. Reasoning about gestural interaction. Comput. Graph. Forum 14, 55-66.
 
30
DUKE, D. J. AND DUCE, D.A. 2000. The formalisation of a cognitive architecture and its application to reasoning about human computer interaction. Form. Asp. Comput..
 
31
DUKE, D. AND HARRISON, M. 1993. Abstract Interaction Objects. Comput. Graph. Forum 12, 1, C25C36.
 
32
 
33
 
34
DUKE, D. J. AND HARRISON, M. 1995b. Interaction and task requirements. In Proceedings of Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems (DSV-IS'95), P. Palanque and R. Bastide, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Vienna, Austria, 54-75.
 
35
DUKE, D. J. AND BARNARD, P.J. 1998. Syndetic modelling. Hum. Comput. Interact. 13, 4, 337-393.
 
36
 
37
DuPuY, R. E. AND DUPUY, T. N., Eds. 1993. The Collins Encyclopedia of Military History. HarperCollins Publishers, New York, NY.
 
38
FURNAS, G. W. 2000. Future Design: Mindful of the Moras. In Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, J. M. Carroll Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
 
39
 
40
HAMMOND, N. V. AND BARNARD, P. 1982. Usability and its multiple determination for the occasional user of interactive systems. In Pathways to the Information Society, M. B. Williams, Ed. North Oxford Academic Publ. Co. Ltd., Oxford, UK, 543-548.
 
41
HARRISON, M. D. AND BARNARD, P. 1993. On defining the requirements for interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE '93, San Diego, CA), S. Fickas and A. C. W. Finklestein, Eds. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 50-55.
 
42
HARmSON, M. AND TORRES, J., Eds. 1997. Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems'97. Springer-Verlag, Vienna, Austria.
 
43
 
44
 
45
 
46
LEAVITT, H.J. 1951. Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J. Abn. Soc. Pysch. 46, 38-50.
 
47
 
48
MARR, D. 1982. Vision. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, NY.
 
49
MACLEAN, A., YOUNG, R. M., BELLOTTI, V. M. E., AND MORAN, T. P. 1991. Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Comput. Interact. 6, 3-4, 201-250.
50
 
51
MAY, J. AND BARNARD, P. 1995a. The case for supportive evaluation during design. Interact. Comput. 7, 115-144.
 
52
MAY, J. AND BARNARD, P.J. 1995b. Cinematography and interface design. In Proceedings of the 3rd IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT '95, Lillehammer, Norway, June 27-29), K. Nordby, P. H. Helmersen, D. J. Gilmore, and S. A. Arnesen, Eds. Chapman and Hall, Ltd., London, UK, 26-31.
 
53
 
54
MAY, J., BARNARD, P., AND BLANDFORD, A. 1993a. Using structural descriptions of interfaces to automate the modeling of user cognition. In Proceedings on User Modeling and User Adaptive Interfaces, 27-64.
 
55
MAY, J., SCOTT, S., AND BARNARD, P. 1995. Structuring Displays: A Psychological Guide. Eurographics Tutorial Notes PS95 TN4.
 
56
MAY, J., TWEEDm, L., AND BARNARD, P. 1993b. Modeling user performance in visually based interactions. In People and Computers VIII: Proceedings of the HCI'93 Conference (HCI '93, Loughborough, England), A. Alty and S. Guest, Eds. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 95-110.
 
57
MEYER, D. AND KIERAS, D. 1997. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Psychol. Rev. 104, 3-65.
 
58
59
 
60
 
61
NEWELL, S. AND CARD, S. K. 1985. The prospects for science in human computer interaction. Hum. Comput. Interact. 1,209-242.
 
62
 
63
 
64
65
 
66
 
67
 
68
RUDISILL, M., LEWIS, C., POLSON, P., AND MCKAY, T. 1996. Human-Computer Interface Design: Success Stories, Emerging Methods and Real World Context. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA.
 
69
SCOTT, S., BARNARD, P. J., AND MAY, J. 2001. Specifying executive representations and processes in number generation tasks. Q. J. Exp. Psychol..
 
70
SHAW, M. E. 1954. Some effects of problem complexity upon problem solving efficiency in different communication nets. J. Exp. Psychol. 48, 211-217.
 
71
 
72
TEASDALE, J. D. AND BARNARD, P. 1993. Affect, Cognition and Change: Re-modeling Depressive Thought. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
 
73
74
75

CITED BY  8


REVIEW

"Laurie P. Dringus : Reviewer"

The authors address the limitations of approaches to theory that currently guides Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) models of interaction. It was noted that the HCI field has become a boundless domain of study given the interdisciplinary conte  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Philip Barnard: colleagues
Jon May: colleagues
David Duke: colleagues
David Duce: colleagues