ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Funkspiel schemes: an alternative to conventional tamper resistance
Full text PdfPdf (528 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Computer and communications security table of contents
Athens, Greece
Pages: 125 - 133  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-203-4
Authors
Johan Håstad  Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Jakob Jonsson  RSA Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden
Ari Juels  RSA Laboratories, Bedford, MA
Moti Yung  CertCo, Inc., New York, NY
Sponsors
Greek Com Soc : Greek Computer Society
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Athens U of Econ & Business : Athens University of Economics and Business
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/352600.352619
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
FIPS 180-1. Secure hash standard. In Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 180-1. U.S. Department of Commerce/N.I.S.T., National Technical Information Service, 1995.
 
2
FIPS 186. Digital signature standard. In Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 186. U.S. Department of Commerce/N.I.S.T., National Technical Information Service, 1994.
 
3
R. Anderson and M. Kuhn. Tamper resistance { a cautionary note. In The Second USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce, pages 1{11, 1996.
 
4
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
D. Boneh, R.A. Demillo, and R.J. Lipton. On the importance of checking cryptographic protocols for faults. In W. Fumy, editor, Advances in Cryptology - Eurocrypt '97, pages 37{51. Springer-Verlag, 1997. LNCS no. 1233.
 
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
T. El Gamal. A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 31:469{472, 1985.
 
15
S. Goldwasser and S. Micali. Probabilistic encryption. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 28:270{299, 1984.
 
16
 
17
D. Kahn. The Codebreakers. Macmillian Publishing Company, 1996.
 
18
O. K?ommerling and M.G. Kuhn. Design principles for tamper-resistant smartcard processors. In USENIX Workshop on Smartcard Technology (Smartcard '99), pages 9{20, 1999.
 
19
 
20
 
21
K. Sako and M. Hirt. E~cient receipt-free voting based on homomorphic encryption. In B. Preneel, editor, Advances in Cryptology { EUROCRYPT '00, pages 539{ 556. Springer-Verlag, 2000. LNCS no. 1807.
 
22
K. Sako and J. Kilian. Receipt-free mix-type voting scheme - a practical solution to the implementation of a voting booth. In L.C. Guillou and J.-J. Quisquater, editors, Advances in Cryptology { EUROCRYPT '95, pages 393{403. Springer-Verlag, 1995. LNCS no. 921.
 
23
G. Simmons. Subliminal channels; past and present. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 5(4):459{473, 1994.
 
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Johan Håstad: colleagues
Jakob Jonsson: colleagues
Ari Juels: colleagues
Moti Yung: colleagues