ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sharing serendipity in the workplace
Full text PdfPdf (384 KB)
Source Collaborative Virtual Environments archive
Proceedings of the third international conference on Collaborative virtual environments table of contents
San Francisco, California, United States
Pages: 173 - 179  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-303-0
Authors
Phillip Jeffrey  GMD FIT, Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Andrew McGrath  BT Adastral Park, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich, Suffolk, U.K.
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/351006.351037
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Forum is a collaborative working environment that consists of two shared spaces: a space for informal interaction (Contact Space), and a workspace for synchronous meetings using audioconferencing support (Meeting Space). It is designed to enable people, who should meet each other to do so naturally, providing an environment for richer online interactions. This paper discusses three evaluations of the Forum Contact Space: a conceptual evaluation, a prototype evaluation, and an ethnographic evaluation. Each evaluation was undertaken to improve the Contact Space usability, examine whether it supports chance encounters, and learn from participant feedback, areas for improvement of future Forum versions. The conceptual evaluation using focus groups showed group discrepancies regarding how the Contact Space would be beneficial for producing chance encounters. In the prototype evaluation, the findings suggest that chance encounters were produced and that the Concept Space was perceived as an environment for supporting group cohesiveness. A common theme from the findings of the ethnographic evaluation was the division of the Contact Space and its related parts into two tools: a core tool; and a peripheral tool, dependent on whether it was active. As groups are increasingly distributed over geographical distances, the benefits of a shared virtual space for communication and interaction are being realised.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aiello, J.R. (1987). Human Spatial Behaviour. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology: Volume 1. New York: Wiley & Sons, 389- 504.
 
2
Bannon L., & B~dker S. (1997). Constructing common information spaces. In: Hughes J, Rodden T, Prinz W, Schmidt K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th European on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW ~97) Conference. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 81-96.
 
3
Becker, B. & Mark, G. (1998). Social conventions in collaborative virtual environments. In Collaborative Virtual Environments ~98: CVE ~98. University of Manchester, UK, 47-55.
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
Forsyth, D.R. (1983). Group Dynamics. Belmont: Wadsworth.
 
9
 
10
Heath, C. & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 69-94.
 
11
Huxor, A. (1999). An Active Worlds Interface to Basic Support for Cooperative Working (BCSW) to Enhance Chance Encounters. Virtual Reality 4, 4-14.
12
 
13
Isaacs, E.A., Whittaker, S., Frohlich, D., & O'Conaill, B. (1997). Informal communication re-examined: New functions for video in supporting opportunistic encounters. In: K. Finn, A. Sellen, S. Wilbur, Video- Mediated Communication, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
 
14
15
 
16
Kraut, R., Fish, R., Root, B., & Chalfonte, B. (1990). Informal communication in organization: Form, function and technology. In S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan, (Eds.), People~s reaction to technology in factories, offices and aerospace, The Claremont Symposium on Applied social Psychology, Sage Publication, 145-199.
17
 
18
 
19
M~lhlbach, L., Bu~, R., & Runde, D. (1999). Some experiences with IRC, webcams and a virtual environment as means for informal communication. In Proceedings of 17th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunication (HFT 99). http://atwww.hhi.de/HFT/work.htm#10.
20
21
22
 
23
 
24
Pycock, J., Palfreyman, K., Allanson, J. & Button, G. (1998). Envisaging collaboration: Using virtual environments to articulate requirements. In Proceedings of CVE ~98, University of Manchester, UK, 73-80.
 
25
26
27
28
29


Collaborative Colleagues:
Phillip Jeffrey: colleagues
Andrew McGrath: colleagues