Collaboration and learning within immersive virtual reality

ABSTRACT

We are studying collaboration and learning within immersive virtual reality (IVR) using a head-mounted display technology. This research, supported by the College of Education and Human Interface Technology Laboratory at the University of Washington, is currently concerned with the activities of 56 ninth grade students at work in a public school environment. Subjects worked as individuals and in pairs while investigating the concepts of global warming within an audio-enhanced virtual reality model of Seattle called Global Change World (GCW). Three groupings of subjects were provided with different collaborative experiences while immersed within the GCW virtual learning environment: (1) Individuals who received minimal support during the learning exercise provided; (2) Paired peers who collaborated throughout the learning exercise; and (3) Individuals who completed the learning exercise in collaboration with an in-world expert companion. It is concluded that collaborative IVR learning experiences can be successfully integrated into existing school curricula in spite of a significant lack of knowledge regarding the nature of human communication, interaction, and learning within VLEs.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bricken, W., Learning in virtual reality. 1990, HIT Lab Memo No. M-90-5. Seattle, WA: Human Interface Technology Laboratory. {Available as online HTML document: http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/m- 90-5}.
• 2: Brown, A.L. and A.S. Palinscar, Guided co-operative learning and individual knowledge acquisition, in Knowing Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, L.B. Resnick, Editor. 1989, Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
• 3: Bruner, J., Actual minds, possible worlds. 1986, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• 4: Burbules, N.C. and M.C. Linn, Science education and philosophy of science: Congruence or contradiction? International Journal of Science Education, 1991. 13(3): p. 227-42.
• 5: Christine M. Byrne, Water on tap: the use of virtual reality as an educational tool, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 1996
• 6: Clancey, W.J., Situated action: A neuropsychological interpretation: Response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 1993. 17: p. 87-116.
• 7: Charles Crook, Computers and the collaborative experience of learning, Routledge, New York, NY, 1994
• 8: Dede, C., The evolution of constructivist learning environments: Immersion in distributed, virtual worlds. Educational Technology, 1995. 35(5): p. 46-52.
• 9: diSessa, A.A., Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study knowledge-based learning. Cognition & Instruction, 1982. 61: p. 37-75.
• 10: Duffy, T.M. and D.H. Jonassen, Constructivism: New Implications for Instructional Technology, in Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation, T.M. Duffy and D.H. Jonassen, Editors. 1992, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.
• 11: Duffy, T.M. and D.J. Cunningham, Constructivism: implications for the design and delivery of instruction, Handbook of Research for Educational Communications Technology, D. Jonassen, Editor. 1996, Simon & Shuster Macmillan: New York, NY.
• 12: Eylon, B.S. and M.C. Linn, Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 1988. 58(3): 251-301.
• 13: Forman, E.A., The role of peer interaction in the social construction of mathematical knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 1989. 13: p. 55-70.
• 14: Jackson, R., D.W. Taylor, and W.D. Winn. Peer collaboration in virtual environments: An investigation multi-participant virtual reality applied in primary science education, in Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association. 1999. Montreal, Canada.
• 15: Jackson, R.L., W. Taylor, and W.D. Winn. A preliminary investigation of multi-participant virtual reality, in British Telecom Presence Workshop. 1998. Ipswich, England.
• 16: Jacobson, R., Adapted from a report to the Evans & Sutherland computer corporation: A virtual worlds guidebook, in The fourth annual Meckler virtual reality conference and exhibition. 1993.
• 17: Kozma, R. and P. Shank, Connecting with the 21st century: Technology in support of educational reform, in ASCD Yearbook: Learning With Technology, C. Dede, Editor. 1998, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Alexandria: VA.
• 18: Lawless, C., P. Smee, and T. O'Shea, Using concept sorting and concept mapping in business and public administration, and in education: An overview. Educational Research, 40(2): p. 219-235.
• 19: McLellan, H., Virtual realities, in Handbook of Research Educational Communications and Technology, D. Jonassen, Editor. 1996, Simon & Shuster Macmillan: New York,
• 20: Minstrell, J.A., Teaching science for understanding, in 1989 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, L.B. Resnick and L.E. Klopfer, Editors. 1989, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Alexandria, VA.
• 21: Newman, D.R., et al., Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997. 48(6): p. 484-495.
• 22: O'Malley, C., ed. Computer supported collaborative learning. 1995, Springer-Verlag: New York.
• 23: Osberg, K.M., et al., The effect of having grade seven students construct virtual environments on their comprehension of science. 1997, HIT Lab Technical Report R-97-19. Seattle: Human Interface Technology Laboratory.
• 24: Piaget, J., The child's conception of the world. 1929, New York, NY: Harcourt & Brace.
• 25: Piaget, J., The equilibration of cognitive structure. 1985, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• 26: Christine Steeples , Terry Mayes, A special section on computer-supported collaborative learning, Computers & Education, v.30 n.3-4, p.219-221, April/May 1998
• 27: Vygotsky, L.S., Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. 1978, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
• 28: Winn, W., A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality, 1993, Seattle, WA: Human Interface Technology Laboratory.
• 29: Winn, W., The Impact of Three-Dimensional Immersive Virtual Environments on Modern Pedagogy. 1997, HIT Lab Technical Report R-97-15. Seattle: Human Interface Technology Laboratory.
• 30: Youngblut, C., Educational uses of virtual reality technology. IDA Document D-2128. 1998, Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses. {Available as a PDF document from http://www.hitl.washington.edu/research/knowledge_base/vir tual-worlds/}.
• 31: David Zeltzer, Autonomy, interaction, and presence, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, v.1 n.1, p.127-132, Winter 1992

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems
          Subjects: Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Collaborative computing

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.7 Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism
          Subjects: Virtual reality

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
collaboration, conceptual change, immersive virtual reality, multi-user virtual learning environments