From usability lab to “design collaboratorium”: reframing usability practice

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an exploratory process in which three industrial usability groups, in cooperation with HCI researchers, worked to reframe their own work practice. The usability groups moved beyond a classical usability setting towards a new way of working which we have coined the Design Collaboratorium. This design collaboratorium is a design approach that creates an open physical and organizational space where designðers, engineers, users and usability professionals meet and work alongside each other. At the same time the design collaboratorium makes use of event-driven ways of working known from participatory design. Some of these working methods are well-documented from literature but adapted to the needs of the particular project, others are new. This paper illustrates how it is posðsible to reframe usability work and it discusses the new usability competence required.

REFERENCES

• 1: Hugh Beyer , Karen Holtzblatt, Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1998
• 2: Binder, T., Brandt, E., Horgen, T. and Zach, G. Staging Events of Collaborative Design, Concurrent Engineering, Tokyo 1998.
• 3: Thomas Binder, Setting the stage for improvised video scenarios, CHI '99 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania [doi>10.1145/632716.632859]
• 4: Jacob Buur , Kirsten Bagger, Replacing usability testing with user dialogue, Communications of the ACM, v.42 n.5, p.63-66, May 1999 [doi>10.1145/301353.301417]
• 5: Klaus B. Bærentsen , Henning Slavensky, A contribution to the design process, Communications of the ACM, v.42 n.5, p.72-77, May 1999 [doi>10.1145/301353.301422]
• 6: Bodker, S. and Graves Petersen, M. (submitted for publication). Design for learning in use. Special Issue of Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, in preparation.
• 7: Susanne Bødker , Kim Halskov Madsen, Methods & tools: context: an active choice in usability work, interactions, v.5 n.4, p.17-25, July/Aug. 1998 [doi>10.1145/278465.278469]
• 8: Susanne Bødker , Kaj Grønbæk, Design in action: from prototyping by demonstration to cooperative prototyping, Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1992
• 9: Bodker, S. & Gronbaek K. Users and Designers in Mutual Activity- an analysis of cooperative activities in systems design. In Engestr6m, Y. & Middleton D. (Eds.). Cognition and Communication at Work, Cambridge University Press, pp. 130-158, 1996.
• 10: Bodker, S. and Christiansen, E. Scenarios as springboards in design. In Bowker, G., Gasser, L., Star, S. L. and Turner, W. (eds.). Social science research, technical systems and cooperative work, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum pp. 217-234, 1997.
• 11: Susanne Bdker, Scenarios in User-Centered Design - Setting the Stage for Reflection and Action, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 3, p.3053, January 05-08, 1999
• 12: Bodker, S. Computer applications as mediators of design and use - a developmental perspective. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, 1999b
• 13: Bodker, S. Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems design, Human Computer Interaction 11(3), 215-236, 1996. An earlier version in Trigg R., Irwing Anderson, S., & Dykstra- Eriksson, E. (Eds.) (1994). Proceedings of PDC '94, pp. 13-20.
• 14: Engestr6m, Y. Learning by expanding. Orienta- Konsultit, Helsinki, 1987.
• 15: Julia Gardner, Strengthening the focus on users' working practices, Communications of the ACM, v.42 n.5, p.78-82, May 1999 [doi>10.1145/301353.301433]
• 16: Joan Greenbaum , Morten Kyng, Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1992
• 17: Gronbaek, K., Grudin, J., Bodker, S. & Bannon, L. Achieving Cooperative System Design - shifting from product to process focus. In Namioka, A. & Schuler, D. (Eds.). Participatory Design: Perspectives of Systems Design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 79-98, 1993.
• 18: John Karat , John L. Bennett, Using scenarios in design meetings—a case study example, Taking software design seriously, Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1991
• 19: Kaasgaard, K., Myhlendorph, T., Snitker, T., and Sorensen, H.E. Remote Usability Testing of a Web Site Information Architecture: "Testing for a Dollar a Day", Brewster, S. Cawsey, A. and Cockton, G. (eds.) Human- Computer Interaction - INTERACT'99 (Volume II), IFIP, 1999, pp. 443-450.
• 20: Giovan F. Lanzara , Lars Mathiassen, Mapping situations within a system development project, Information and Management, v.8 n.1, p.3-20, Jan. 1985 [doi>10.1016/0378-7206(85)90065-5]
• 21: Thea Borgholm , Kim Halskov Madsen, Cooperative usability practices, Communications of the ACM, v.42 n.5, p.91-97, May 1999 [doi>10.1145/301353.301438]
• 22: Madsen, K.H. and Petersen M.G. Reflections on three design sessions, Brewster, S. Cawsey, A. and Cockton, G. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT'99 (Volume II), IFIP, 1999, pp 185-190.
• 23: Mogensen, P., & Trigg, R. Artifacts as triggers for participatory analysis. In Kuhn, S. Muller, M. & Meskill, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC). Boston, MA, 1992, pp. 55- 62.
• 24: Muller, M, Haslwanter, J.H., Dayton, T. Participatory practices in the software lifecycle, in Helanden, M., Landauer, T & Prabdu, P., Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, North Holland Amsterdam, pp. 955-298, 1998.
• 25: C. Nielsen, Testing in the Field, Proceedings of the Third Asian Pacific Computer and Human Interaction, p.285, July 15-17, 1998
• 26: Sch6n D. A. The Reflective Practitioner- How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York, 1983.
• 27: Susan Leigh Star, The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving, Distributed artificial intelligence: vol. 2, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1990
• 28: Suchman, L. and Jordan, B. Computerization and women's knowledge, in Tijdens, K, Jennings, M., Wagner, I, Weggelaar, M., Women Work and Computerization. Forming new alliances, North Holland, 1989, pp. 153-160.
• 29: Timpka, T. & Sj6berg, C. Voices in design: The dynamics of participatory information systems, Trigg, R., Anderson, S.I. & Dykstra-Ericson, E. PDC'94: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Palo Alto, CA: CPSR/ACM, 1994, pp. 75-86,
• 30: Randall H. Trigg , Susanne Bødker , Kaj Grøbæk, Open-ended interaction in cooperative prototyping a video-based analysis, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 3, p.63-86, Aug. 1991

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management, Measurement, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
collaboration, design collaboratorium, usability work, user participation