ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: a sketch of Web site design practice
Full text PdfPdf (570 KB)
Source Designing Interactive Systems archive
Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques table of contents
New York City, New York, United States
Pages: 263 - 274  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-219-0
Authors
Mark W. Newman  Group for User Interface Research, Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
James A. Landay  Group for User Interface Research, Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 67,   Downloads (12 Months): 403,   Citation Count: 33
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/347642.347758
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Through a study of web site design practice, we observed that designers employ multiple representations of web sites as they progress through the design process, and that these representations allow them to focus on different aspects of the design. Designers also employ multiple tools during the course of a project, including graphic design, web development, presentation, and word processing software, as well as pen and paper. Sketching on paper is especially important during the design exploration phase of a project, when designers wish to explore many design possibilities quickly without focusing on low-level details. Web site design tools intended to support the early phases of the design process should employ informal interaction techniques, should support multiple site representations, and should integrate well with other applications that designers use regularly.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Black, A., Visible Planning on Paper and on Screen: The Impact of Working Medium on Decision-making by Novice Graphic Designers. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1990.9(4): p. 283-296.
 
3
Blomberg, J., J. Giacomi, A. Mosher, and P. Swenton-Wall, Ethnographic Field Methods and Their Relation to Design, in Participatory Design." Principles and Practices, D. Schuter and A. Namioka, Editors. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. p. 123- 155, 1993.
 
4
Evolve Design, Evolve Process, 1999. http://www, evolved, c om/pro c e s s. html
 
5
Fire Engine Red, Process: Our Process, 1999. http://www, enginere d. c om/our_pro c e s s. html
 
6
 
7
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Lawson, B., Design in mind. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture, 1994.
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
Studio Archetype, Studio Archetype: Process, 1998. http ://www. studioarchetype, corn/process/ quickview.html
 
17
18

CITED BY  33

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark W. Newman: colleagues
James A. Landay: colleagues