The effect of information scent on searching information: visualizations of large tree structures

ABSTRACT

Focus + context information visualizations have sought to amplify human cognition by increasing the amount of information immediately available to the user. We study how the focus + context distortion of the Hyperbolic Tree browser affects information foraging behavior in a task similar to the CHI '97 Browse Off. In comparison to a more conventional browser, Hyperbolic users searched more nodes, searched at a faster rate, and showed more learning. However, the performance of the Hyperbolic was found to be highly affected by “information scent”, proximal cues to the value of distal information. Strong information scent made hyperbolic search faster than with a conventional browser. Conversely, weak scent put the hyperbolic tree at a disadvantage. There appears to be two countervailing processes affecting visual attention in these displays: strong information scent expands the spotlight of attention whereas crowding of targets in the compressed region of the Hyperbolic narrows it. The results suggest design improvements.

REFERENCES

• 1: Card, S.K., J. Mackinlay, and B. Schneiderman, Information Visualization. 1999, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
• 2: John Lamping , Ramana Rao , Peter Pirolli, A focus+context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.401-408, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223904.223956]
• 3: Drury, C.G. and M.R. Clement, The effect of area, density, and number of background characters on visual search. Human Factors, 1978.20: p. 597-602.
• 4: Pirolli, P. and S.K. Card, Information foraging. Psychological Review, 1999.
• 5: Colin Ware, Information visualization: perception for design, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 2000
• 6: Wolfe, J.M., What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 1998.9: p. 33- 39.
• 7: Kevin Mullet , Christopher Fry , Diane Schiano, On your marks, get set, browse!, CHI '97 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems: looking to the future, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia [doi>10.1145/1120212.1120285]
• 8: Peter Pirolli, Computational models of information scent-following in a very large browsable text collection, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.3-10, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258558]
• 9: Bell, W.J., Searching behavior: The behavioral ecology of finding resources. 1991, London: Chapman and Hall. 358.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
      I.2.8 Problem Solving, Control Methods, and Search
          Subjects: Graph and tree search strategies

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors, Management, Measurement

Keywords:
focus + context, hyperbolic tree, information foraging, information visualization