ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluation of a simple and effective music information retrieval method
Full text PdfPdf (795 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Athens, Greece
Pages: 73 - 80  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-226-3
Authors
Stephen Downie  Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL
Michael Nelson  Faculty of Information and Media Studies, Middlesex College, Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7
Sponsors
Athens U of Econ & Business : Athens University of Economics and Business
Greek Com Soc : Greek Computer Society
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 115,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/345508.345551
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We developed, and then evaluated, a music information retrieval (MIR) system based upon the intervals found within the melodies of a collection of 9354 folksongs. The songs were converted to an interval-only representation of monophonic melodies and then fragmented t into length-n subsections called n-grams. The length of these n-grams and the degree to which we precisely represent the intervals are variables analyzed in this paper. We constructed a collection of “musical word” databases using the text-based, SMART information retrieval system. A group of simulated queries, some of which contained simulated errors, was run against these databases. The results were evaluated using the normalized precision and normalized recall measures. Our concept of “musical words” shows great merit thus implying that useful MIR systems can be constructed simply and efficiently using pre-existing text-based information retrieval software. Second, this study is a formal and comprehensive evaluation of a MIR system using rigorous statistical analyses to determine retrieval effectiveness.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Barlow, Harold, and Sam Morgenstern. A dictionary of musical themes. London: Ernest Benn, 1949.
 
2
Brook, Barry S. Thematic catalogue. In The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians, ed. Stanley Sadie. London: Macmillan Publishers, 1980.
 
3
Brook, Barry S., and Murray J. Gould. Notating music with ordinary typewriter characters (A Plaine and Easie code for Musicke). Fontes Artis Musicae 11: 142, 1964.
 
4
Dowling, W. Jay. Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review 85 (4): 341-354, 1978.
 
5
Downie, J. Stephen. The MusiFind Music Information Retrieval Project, Phase III: Evaluation of indexing options. In Connectedness: Information, systems, people, organizations: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, 7-10 June 1995, Edmonton, Alberta, 135-146. Toronto: Canadian Association for Information Science, 1995.
 
6
Downie, J. Stephen. Representing melodies as collections of"musical words": Networks Poster presented at ALISE '99, 26-29January 1999, Philadelphia, PA., 1999.
7
 
8
Downie, J. Stephen. Evaluating a simple approach to music information retrieval : conceiving melodic n-grams as text. London, Ont. : Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Western Ontario, 1999. {dissertation}
 
9
Duggan, Mary K.. Electronic information and applications in musicology and music theory. Library Trends 40 (4): 756-780, 1992.
 
10
 
11
Hewlett, Walter B., and Eleanor Selfridge-Field, eds. Computing in musicology. Vol. 11, Melodic similarity: Concepts, procedures, and applications. Menlo Park: Center for Computer Assisted Research in the Humanities, 1998.
 
12
BKeller, Kate van Winkle, and Carolyn Rabson. National tune index, 18th century secular music. New York: University Music Edition, 1980.
 
13
 
14
McLane, Alexander. Music as information. Annual Review of lnformation Science and Technology 31: 225- 262, 1996.
15
 
16
McNab, Rodger J., Lloyd A. Smith, David Bainbridge, and Ian H. Witten. The New Zealand Digital Library MELody inDEX. D-Lib Magazine (May), 1997. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may97/meldex/O5witten.html
 
17
Parsons, Denys. The directory of tunes and musical themes. New York: Spencer Brown, 1975.
 
18
Prechelt, Lutz and Rainer Typke. An interface for melody input. Unpublished manuscript, 1998. See also: http ://wwwipd.ira.uka.de/tuneserver
 
19
Randel, Don Michael, ed. The new Harvard dictionary of music. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1986.
 
20
RISM. Repertoire international des sources musicales: International inventory of musical sources. Series .4/11, Music manuscripts after 1600. CD-ROM database. Munich: K. G. Saur Verlag, 1997.
 
21
 
22
Setfridge-Field, Eleanor. 1994. The MuseData universe: A system of musical information. Computing in Musicology 9:11-30.
 
23
Selfridge-Field, Eleanor. Conceptual and representational issues in melodic comparison. Computing in Musicology 11: 3-64, 1998.
 
24
 
25
Tonta, Yasar. Analysis of search failures in document retrieval systems: A review. Public-Access Computer Systems Review 3 (2): 4-53, 1992.
 
26
Uitenbogerd, Alexandra, and Justin Zobel. Matching algorithms for large music databases. A technical report. Melbourne, Australia: Department of Computer Science, RMIT University, 1999.

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stephen Downie: colleagues
Michael Nelson: colleagues