ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Relevance feedback with a small number of relevance judgements: incremental relevance feedback vs. document clustering
Full text PdfPdf (645 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Athens, Greece
Pages: 10 - 16  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-226-3
Author
Makoto Iwayama  Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd., Hatoyama, Saitama 350-0395, Japan
Sponsors
Athens U of Econ & Business : Athens University of Economics and Business
Greek Com Soc : Greek Computer Society
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 18
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/345508.345538
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The use of incremental relevance feedback and document clustering were investigated in an relevance feedback environment in which the number of relevance judgements was quite small. Through experiments on the TREC collection, the incremental relevance feedback approach was found not to improve the overall search effectiveness. The clustering approach was found to be promising, although it sometimes over-focuses on a particular topic in a query and ignores the others. To overcome this problem, a query-biased clustering algorithm was developed and shown to be effective.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
C. Buckley, M. Mitra, J. Walz, and C. Cardie. Using clustering and SuperConcepts within SMART: TREC 6. In Proceedings of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6), 1998.
4
 
5
6
 
7
D. A. Evans, A. Huettner, Tong X., P. Jansen, and J. Bennett. Effectiveness of clustering in ad-hoc retrieval. In Proceedings of the Seventh Text RE- trieval Conference (TREC-7), 1999.
8
9
 
10
11
12
13
14
15
 
16

CITED BY  18